2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving ORR activity of carbon nanotubes by hydrothermal carbon deposition method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among those candidates, the N-doped carbon material as a representative metal-free catalyst is of particular interest. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Alien nitrogen atom doped into the graphitic framework changes electronic density of carbon surface and thus favors the oxygen molecule adsorption and further reduction. [29,[41][42][43] Despite of the high activity of N-doped carbons, their performances are still far from satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those candidates, the N-doped carbon material as a representative metal-free catalyst is of particular interest. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Alien nitrogen atom doped into the graphitic framework changes electronic density of carbon surface and thus favors the oxygen molecule adsorption and further reduction. [29,[41][42][43] Despite of the high activity of N-doped carbons, their performances are still far from satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table , the carbon content determined by elemental analysis (EA) is a little lower than that derived from XPS analysis because of their different measurement principles. As discussed, EA can give the accurate carbon content in the samples, which can provide important information on the carbon residue. Apparently, the carbon contents in 10N x WF‐EC are much larger than those of 10N x WF due to the carbonization of polyhydroxy compounds, which act as the physical barriers to inhibit Ni sintering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, graphene and CNT can provide excellent electrical and mechanical properties but limited surface area and accessible pores mostly due to aggregation, whereas activated carbons offer high surface area and abundant pore volume with a well‐structured micro‐ and mesoporous network but poor electrical conductivity. These hybrid structures can be tailored during synthesis to supplement the limitations of each other . For instance, hydrothermal‐prepared CNT/carbon composites, CNT/activated carbon blends, 3D graphene‐based framework etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%