2008
DOI: 10.1080/00986280802373841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Learning through Interventions of Student-Generated Questions and Concept Maps

Abstract: Using the principles of the scholarship of teaching and learning, we evaluated 2 learning strategies to determine if they could improve student exam performance in general psychology. After the second of 3 exams, we gave students the option of participating in a specific learning activity and assessed its impact using the third exam. In Study 1, participating students generated a minimum of 3 questions per week over course material. Lower performing students who participated improved their exam performance suc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
34
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a comparative study by Berry and Chew (2008), undergraduate students who generated a minimum of three questions per week related to course content produced higher grades in examinations than the comparison group who generated no questions. They found a significant positive correlation between the number of questions generated and students' test scores.…”
Section: Framing Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In a comparative study by Berry and Chew (2008), undergraduate students who generated a minimum of three questions per week related to course content produced higher grades in examinations than the comparison group who generated no questions. They found a significant positive correlation between the number of questions generated and students' test scores.…”
Section: Framing Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It has long been recognized that asking students to create questions enhances their engagement with, and understanding of, course materials (Draper, ; Rosenshine, Meister, & Chapman, ), resulting in a more solid retention of concepts (Berry & Chew, ; Chin & Brown, ; Lan & Lin, ). The process of writing multiple‐choice questions—constructing question stems, working out correct answers and distractors, and writing explanations has potential not only to further deepen understanding, but also to develop skills of problem solving and information synthesis (Palmer & Devitt, ; Yu & Wu, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can help develop skills of metacognition, as well as generating divergent and convergent questions, thus also developing their higher order thinking skills. Low performing students appeared to have benefited more from generating questions compared to their higher performing counterpart (Berry & Chew, 2015). Student-generated questions have been tried with Key Stage 2 students (Dunlop, Compton, Clarke, & McKelvey-Martin, 2015) in which after given a stimulus, students volunteered questions.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%