2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10971-018-4608-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving imprinted shape cavities of molecularly imprinted sol–gel host matrix with minimal relaxation for sensing of creatinine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported by Ang and Low (2015), the overall binding activity of a creatinine-based MIP (molar ratio of template:cross-linker:monomer = 1:5:5) was heterogeneously defined using the Freundlich adsorption model with a heterogeneity index of 0.88. In spite of the heterogeneous binding sites in MIPs, the: shape factor retained on the template-induced cavities (Yungerman and Srebnik, 2006; Ang and Low, 2015; Ang et al , 2018); affinity of functional cross-linker (Ang and Low, 2015); and background porosity of the polymer (Yungerman and Srebnik, 2006) will also contribute to the recognition behavior of MIPs. …”
Section: Molecularly Imprinted Polymer In Diagnosticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As reported by Ang and Low (2015), the overall binding activity of a creatinine-based MIP (molar ratio of template:cross-linker:monomer = 1:5:5) was heterogeneously defined using the Freundlich adsorption model with a heterogeneity index of 0.88. In spite of the heterogeneous binding sites in MIPs, the: shape factor retained on the template-induced cavities (Yungerman and Srebnik, 2006; Ang and Low, 2015; Ang et al , 2018); affinity of functional cross-linker (Ang and Low, 2015); and background porosity of the polymer (Yungerman and Srebnik, 2006) will also contribute to the recognition behavior of MIPs. …”
Section: Molecularly Imprinted Polymer In Diagnosticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shape factor retained on the template-induced cavities (Yungerman and Srebnik, 2006; Ang and Low, 2015; Ang et al , 2018);…”
Section: Molecularly Imprinted Polymer In Diagnosticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the removal of the template from the complex microcavities is inefficient using Soxhlet extraction, 19,20 therefore to solve this problem supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO 2 ) was selected as a substitute for conventional organic solvents owing to their particular physicochemical properties. 21 As one of the most widely used uids in supercritical uids, scCO 2 has many advantages, including being non-toxic, non-ammable, having a low critical point and easy storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%