Improving healthcare through process standardization: a general hospital case study

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze two process standardization theoretical conceptual constructs: process variants unification; and distinction between standard, routine and non-routine processes. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two conceptual constructs based on a single case study representing a general hospital’s (GH) process standardization, approach and results. The authors research whether process standardization implemented in a GH conforms to the process variants unification concept approach and its assumed benefits and whether implemented process standardization enables process management improvement based on distinguishing standard, routine and non-routine processes. Findings In accordance with the process variants unification conceptual construct, the hospital task force determined a uniform basic patient comprehensive treatment process at the hospital level, which allows synergy among departments. Uniform process activities reflect the differences between standard, routine and non-routine processes. Practical implications Process standardization through unification improves performance by establishing a common framework enabling shared experience based on improved process understanding. Distinguishing standard, routine and non-routine processes is useful for analyzing process management. This distinction provides guidelines for process implementation and measurement improvement. The paper also shows that increased routinization and standardization represent levers for process improvement. Originality/value The authors analyze theoretical constructs based on a single case study and confirm that theoretical conceptual construct application can provide better process management, which is important for practitioners.

Interdisciplinary behavioral health provider perceptions of implementing the Collaborative Chronic Care Model: an i-PARIHS-guided qualitative study

“…Especially given the CCM’s goal of delivering coordinated care, future CCM implementation would benefit from keeping information on available community resources up to date, to which CCM team members can connect their patients. If a collection of resources is to be created, then it is important to specify the details of how the collection would be regularly updated and by whom, consistent with best practices for process standardization [ 39 ]. Such specification is also related to defining CCM team member roles, as noted below for the fourth theme discussed here.…”

Health professionals’ subjectivation towards end of life and death in home care service

“…In the hospital environment, health professionals need to follow routines and standards, as this reduces possible errors. Furthermore, standardizing care within hospital-based guidelines, checklists, and protocols allows for better quality control, as well as facilitating the learning process of practices (20) . Thus, in the hospital, professionals classify, organize and follow standards and routines in their practices, thus establishing control over patients.…”

Processes and Practices Improvement of Sample Receiving Counter at Government Clinical Laboratory in Sri Lanka

“…Process Mapping (PM) is an important tool in identifying complex processes and it clearly indicates the existing gaps. PMs were reported from a wide range of healthcare settings and in laboratory service its usage is about 3% [9]. Following gaps were identified in the SRC using the tools introduced in the methodology part.…”