2008
DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-0914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Handoff Communications in Critical Care*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has typically assessed handover quality by three types of measures: its content, process or outcomes (Cheung et al 2010, Manser & Foster 2011. The first categoryhandover contenthas been mostly descriptive, concentrating on the completeness and accuracy of information (Arora et al 2005, Berkenstadt et al 2008, Horwitz et al 2009a. These studies typically showed verbal handover to be incomplete compared with the information available in the patient's record (Lamond 2000, Arora et al 2007 or compared with a pre-defined handover protocol (Catchpole et al 2007).…”
Section: Assessing Handover Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has typically assessed handover quality by three types of measures: its content, process or outcomes (Cheung et al 2010, Manser & Foster 2011. The first categoryhandover contenthas been mostly descriptive, concentrating on the completeness and accuracy of information (Arora et al 2005, Berkenstadt et al 2008, Horwitz et al 2009a. These studies typically showed verbal handover to be incomplete compared with the information available in the patient's record (Lamond 2000, Arora et al 2007 or compared with a pre-defined handover protocol (Catchpole et al 2007).…”
Section: Assessing Handover Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The audio-recorded data of nurse handoffs were analyzed using conversational analysis methods -verbal content was broken down into utterances (i.e., psychological analogs of a single unit of experience (Apker et al, 2010;Morrow et al, 1993)) and categorized along multiple dimensions: structure (i.e., conversational moves, modified from (H. H. Clark et al, 1987)), content (adapted from (Berkenstadt et al, 2008), and included a comprehensive list of specific clinical elements relevant to critical care patients), and breakdowns in communication (i.e., doubtful information, missing information, incorrect/conflicting information, repetitive information or misinterpreted information). All the data codes related to both resident and nurse handoffs were then transferred to a Microsoft Excel workbook for further analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of handoffs, however, is adversely affected by several factors: The important ones include 1) Lack of standardized handoff tools [19] 2) Iinformation omissions and inaccuracies [20] 3) Communication breakdowns related to language, social, and skill issues [21,22, 23] 4) Lack of training [24] 5) Contextual constraints [25] 6) These factors are usually exacerbated in academic settings by restrictions on resident workhours that increase the frequency of transitions [26,27].…”
Section: Factors Affecting Hand Offmentioning
confidence: 99%