1986
DOI: 10.1016/0747-5632(86)90030-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving computer-based problem solving training: The role of the teacher as mediator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The game was a useful "prop" for the therapist but was not a replacement for a quality therapeutic process. In another study by Delclos and Kulewicz (1986)…”
Section: Limitations Associated With Game-based Social Skills Trainingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The game was a useful "prop" for the therapist but was not a replacement for a quality therapeutic process. In another study by Delclos and Kulewicz (1986)…”
Section: Limitations Associated With Game-based Social Skills Trainingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The computer is no longer envisioned as an automated replacement for the therapist, but as a conduit for faithfully transmitting the therapeutic interactions of humans. The computer-as-replacement model of the 1980s can be seen, for example, in a study by Delclos and Kulewicz (1986), which demonstrates that an educational video game can improve sixth-graders' problem-solving skills up to a point, but that live teacher intervention is required to advance them past this plateau. Rather than explore possible synergy between facilitator and computer, the authors conclude that through greater understanding of human compensation for computer shortcomings, intelligent programs may yet come to take on the role played by the human teacher in this study.…”
Section: Online Revolution: Changing Horizons For Therapeutic Video Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Papert, 1980; Sherwine, 1983; Norton, 1985; Swick, 1989; Hofmeister, 1989 and others) Despite these high hopes following approximately 20 years of research on the subject of computer efficiency in promoting learning and thinking, it became apparent that the computer did not 'live up' to the above expectations (Levin & Fisher, 1983; Becker, 1987; Eisenberg, 1990). The significant role of the human mediator as compared to the 'mechanical teacher', was repeatedly demonstrated (Kelman, 1986; Clark, 1985; Leron, 1985;Delclos & Kulewicz, 1986;Kremersky, 1989, and others). Of particular interest are findings that kindergarten children who used a computer program independently benefited from the program significantly less than other groups that used the same program with adult assistance (Shani, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%