2019
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.11311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements to the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Abstract: This Viewpoint summarizes results of dissemination and implementation research conducted by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to reevaluate the presentation of USPSTF Recommendation Statements and explains changes made to the statements and accompanying materials to increase clarity and enhance implementation of recommendations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
118
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors mention that it is important to improve these services so that they can provide more comprehensive information and timely help from trained professionals [28]. On the other hand, the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends that counseling interventions should be applied in women with risk factors for depression, since they found convincing evidence that they help prevent perinatal depression, among the most effective they included cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors mention that it is important to improve these services so that they can provide more comprehensive information and timely help from trained professionals [28]. On the other hand, the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends that counseling interventions should be applied in women with risk factors for depression, since they found convincing evidence that they help prevent perinatal depression, among the most effective they included cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potential advantages of early detection, population-based asymptomatic pancreatic cancer screening is not considered to be cost-effective because of the low incidence (4). However, screening within high-risk populations could be preferable, but research to identify people at high enough risk to warrant screening is needed (5,6). People who are currently considered to be at a higher risk include individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer (7), certain germline mutations (7), cystic lesions in the pancreas (8,9), new-onset diabetes mellitus (10), and postpancreatitis diabetes mellitus (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PC is often diagnosed in an advanced stage and as such has very poor survival, with the overall 5-year survival reaching only 11.5% (1). Because of the low incidence of PC in the general population (13.2 per 100,000 person-years) (1), widespread population-based screening is not currently recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force (2). Therefore, a targeted approach to screening among higher-risk populations represents a key opportunity to alter the natural history of this disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%