39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 2003
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-4504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements to the Solid Performance Program (SPP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been numerous papers on the subject covering both experimental observations and modeling. 4,30,31,32,33,40,41,45,46,49,50,51,52,53,59,60,61,66,68,71,72,73 The details of this work is well beyond the scope of this report. Some important conclusions and comments about non-linear combustion instability can be made.…”
Section: E Non-linear Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been numerous papers on the subject covering both experimental observations and modeling. 4,30,31,32,33,40,41,45,46,49,50,51,52,53,59,60,61,66,68,71,72,73 The details of this work is well beyond the scope of this report. Some important conclusions and comments about non-linear combustion instability can be made.…”
Section: E Non-linear Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These curves were calculated using the Standard Performance Prediction/Standard Stability Program (SPP/SSP) code developed under both Air Force and Navy sponsorship and recently improved to predict non-linear motor behavior. 47,48,49,50,51 The inputs to this program include complete motor geometry and detailed propellant properties, including the propellant response function. The program uses a grain design and ballistic code to provide inputs to the stability module.…”
Section: Motor Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we present an application of FOM to the simulation of solid rocket motors. Our test performs a nearly complete burn (95% burn) of an attitude control motor (ACM) rocket, courtesy of Aerojet Inc. Our test assumed uniform speed, similar to commercial analysis tools for solid rocket motors, such as SPP'02 [26]. In reality, the regression rate of a solid rocket is fairly uniform except during initial ignition transients, so this setting is fairly representative.…”
Section: Application To Solid Rocket Motorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This code can also be useful for risk analyses when the grain has a crack and/or air bubble in it. In some previous researches, the methods of 3D burning surface simulation have been proposed in some previous researches conducted in America [53][54][55] , France 3) , China 56) and Turkey 2,57) . Ref 53 shows that the code can treat not only 3D ballistics analyses but also deal with several options such as for segmented motors, for dual propellant motors, for defining case insulation and for exporting the burning surface data for CFD.…”
Section: Internal Ballistics Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%