“…There is a risk that even if the AT is useful for the user, it might not be used since it does not have a sufficiently positive influence on the user's life (Hersch, 2010). There are studies, evaluating cognitive support, both in terms of AT and in terms of support from off-the-shelf technology, that report to what extent the users' individual goals have been achieved as an outcome measure (Wade & Troy, 2001;Boman et al, 2010;Lindén, Lexell & Larsson Lund, 2011), but they are rare. Instead, there are factors such as, e.g., the considered usefulness of function of the AT Meiland et al, 2012), experienced usefulness (Topo et al, 2007), satisfaction of function, experienced autonomy, quality of life (Meiland et al, 2012), completion of the targeted task (Oriani, et al, 2003;Lancioini et al, 2010), and, finally, benefits (Topo et al, 2007;Lindqvist, Nygård, & Borell, 2013) and experiences when using the AT (Topo, Jyllhä & Laine, 2002;Lindqvist & Borell, 2012) have been evaluated.…”