2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in visual ability with first-eye, second-eye, and bilateral cataract surgery measured with the Visual Symptoms and Quality of Life Questionnaire

Abstract: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With cataract surgery being one of the most commonly performed procedures worldwide,24–26 assessment of the devices used in this field is important in the pursuit of advancing the field and improving outcomes for patients 27. Furthermore, with the rise in patient expectation with cataract surgery,28 29 increasing use of multifocal and pseudo-accommodative IOLs, and co-correction of refractive errors, the final refractive outcome is of utmost importance 30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With cataract surgery being one of the most commonly performed procedures worldwide,24–26 assessment of the devices used in this field is important in the pursuit of advancing the field and improving outcomes for patients 27. Furthermore, with the rise in patient expectation with cataract surgery,28 29 increasing use of multifocal and pseudo-accommodative IOLs, and co-correction of refractive errors, the final refractive outcome is of utmost importance 30.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rasch analysis is the gold standard in questionnaire development and validation (Gothwal et al. ; Khadka et al. , , ; McAlinden et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These improvements in quality of vision are in line with improvements using quality of life scores and visual functioning after cataract surgery, which may indicate a relationship between these latent traits. 18 Despite an overall large sample size, the sample sizes are smaller within each group, which indicates a limitation of the study. Assuming the same differences found here, sample sizes of 4921 in each group would be required to find differences due to ocular comorbidity, with much larger samples required to find differences between first and second eye results (80% power, type I error of .001 to account for multiple comparisons).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 98%