Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2000 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (C
DOI: 10.1109/rams.2000.816304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in reliability assessment and prediction methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the development of such methods requires more effort [15]. Instead of assessing the system on the component level, some approaches use a top-down approach in which the field-reliability of new systems is estimated from field-data of similar systems in operation [8,9].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the development of such methods requires more effort [15]. Instead of assessing the system on the component level, some approaches use a top-down approach in which the field-reliability of new systems is estimated from field-data of similar systems in operation [8,9].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with RGT, few papers have been published to address RGP related to design, manufacturing, software, and process issues for electronic equipment. Johnson & Gullo [19] and Gullo [20] reported an in-service reliability prediction tool HIRAP developed by Honeywell engineers. HIRAP breaks failures into seven categories among which category 1-5 consist of hardware failures and categories 6 and 7 are used to address process, manufacturing and design errors.…”
Section: Challenges In Reliability Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%