2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of theoretical storm characterization for different climate conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1c). A theoretical basis for the proposal of these two wave-height-evolution models can be found in Martin-Soldevilla et al (2015), who conducted a shape analysis for one point at the NW Mediteranean Sea. This analysis is herein extended on a regional scale.…”
Section: Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1c). A theoretical basis for the proposal of these two wave-height-evolution models can be found in Martin-Soldevilla et al (2015), who conducted a shape analysis for one point at the NW Mediteranean Sea. This analysis is herein extended on a regional scale.…”
Section: Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional approach is usually based on the probabilistic denition of a single parameter, typically the wave height. Other concurrent components as the duration of the storm, the storm total energy and the associated wave period inuence the nal response of a beach or the damage evolution of a structure (Martin-Soldevilla et al, 2015;Melby and Kobayashi, 2011). These variables are known to be semi-dependent (Salvadori et al, 2007; de Waal and van Gelder, 2005), but the classical methodology either a) assumes one variable to be stochastic and the other ones to be deterministic or, b) assumes all variables to be stochastic but completely independent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the storm history evolution of the sea states in sea and swell waves is not adequately reproduced by these theoretical models and do not provide enough information for applications where the features and evolution of the metocean time series are relevant (Jäger et al, 2018;Martín-Soldevilla et al, 2015) and there is still need to account for the random temporal evolution of storm events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should note that the definition of a storm duration and the storm threshold of H s is always questionable. Soldevilla et al (2015) provides further details on storm characterizations for different climate conditions, which is not the main focus of this work. However, according to the autocorrelation analysis (Figure 1), subsampling the maximum significant wave height and the associated up-crossing mean period for a 2-day interval still shows a bit of short dependence.…”
Section: Case Study and Wave Datamentioning
confidence: 99%