Improvement of the K-profile Model for the Planetary Boundary Layer based on Large Eddy Simulation Data

Abstract

Modifications of the widely used K-profile model of the planetary boundary layer (PBL), reported by Troen and Mahrt (TM) in 1986, are proposed and their effects examined by comparison with large eddy simulation (LES) data. The modifications involve three parts. First, the heat flux from the entrainment at the inversion layer is incorporated into the heat and momentum profiles, and it is used to predict the growth of the PBL directly. Second, profiles of the velocity scale and the Prandtl number in the PBL are proposed, in contrast to the constant values used in the TM model. Finally, non-local mixing of momentum was included. The results from the new PBL model and the original TM model are compared with LES data. The TM model was found to give too high PBL heights in the PBL with strong shear, and too low heights for the convection-dominated PBL, which causes unrealistic heat flux profiles. The new PBL model improves the predictability of the PBL height and produces profiles that are more realistic. Moreover, the new PBL model produces more realistic profiles of potential temperature and velocity. We also investigated how each of these three modifications affects the results, and found that explicit representation of the entrainment rate is the most critical.

Impacts of aerosol-radiation feedback on local air quality during a severe haze episode in Nanjing megacity, eastern China

“…The aerosol effects on photolysis rates are calculated using the Fast-J photolysis scheme (Wild et al, 2000). The other physical options contain the Noah land surface scheme (Ek et al, 2003), the Lin microphysics scheme (Lin et al, 1983), and the Yonsei University boundary layer scheme (Noh et al, 2003).…”

North-western Mediterranean sea-breeze circulation in a regional climate system model

“…Moreover, to avoid unrealistic departure from the driving fields, indiscriminate nudging is applied with a coefficient of 5 × 10 −5 s −1 for temperature, humidity and velocity components above the planetary boundary layer (Salameh et al 2010;Omrani et al 2013Omrani et al , 2015. A complete set of physics parameterizations is used with the WRF Single-Moment 5-class microphysical scheme (Hong et al 2004), the new Kain-Fritsch convection scheme (Kain 2004), the Yonsei University (YSU) planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme (Noh et al 2003) and a parameterization based on the similarity theory (Monin and Obukhov 1954) for the turbulent fluxes. The radiative scheme is based on the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTM) (Mlawer et al 1997) and the Dudhia (1989) parameterization for the longwave and shortwave radiation, respectively.…”

Impacts of weather conditions modified by urban expansion on surface ozone: Comparison between the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta regions

“…Different physics and chemistry options in the WRF-Chem can be used. In this study, we used the physical parameterizations including the NCEP-5 class microphysics (Hong et al, 1998), a new Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization (Kain, 2004), Dudhia shortwave radiation (Dudhia, 1989), RRTM longwave radiation Mlawer et al (1997), the Yonsei University (YSU) planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme (Noh et al, 2003), and the Noah land surface scheme (Chen and Dudhia, 2001). The Noah LSM provides surface sensible and latent heat fluxes, and surface skin temperatures as the lower boundary conditions to WRF.…”