1980
DOI: 10.1080/00103628009367061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of soil structure and plant growth by addition of alum sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural change in the soil microbial community structure did not however adversely affect the soils microbial diversity and even the observed waterworks sludge induced pH increases were not considered to be detrimental to soil health, but were beneficial since they were within typical pH ranges. These results are in good agreement with those of Rengasamy et al (1980) where at an alum sludge application rate up to 2 tonnes/ha, an increase in water retention in the three soil types studies was observed.…”
Section: For Structural Soil Improvementsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structural change in the soil microbial community structure did not however adversely affect the soils microbial diversity and even the observed waterworks sludge induced pH increases were not considered to be detrimental to soil health, but were beneficial since they were within typical pH ranges. These results are in good agreement with those of Rengasamy et al (1980) where at an alum sludge application rate up to 2 tonnes/ha, an increase in water retention in the three soil types studies was observed.…”
Section: For Structural Soil Improvementsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, for such approach to be justified as in the case of waterworks sludge, it is very important to examine the long and short-term effects of such applications on soil quality, particularly from the physico-chemical and biological point of view (Cameron et al, 1997;Titshall and Hughes, 2005). Contrasting however, is the fact that while some studies have reported considerable improvements in typical soil qualities like water retention and pH, and by extension good crop growth (Rengasamy et al, 1980;Robert and Edward, 1987;Moodley and Hughes, 2005;Pecku et al, 2005), others have noted some undesirable impacts (Young et al, 1988;Heil and Barbarick, 1989;Owen, 2002). In most cases, plant available phosphorus and crop yield were significantly reduced at higher application rates.…”
Section: For Structural Soil Improvementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, Mahdy et al (2007) showed that Al-WTR rates of up to 67 Mg ha −1 increased corn (Zea mays L.) yield and P concentrations; greater Al-WTR rates caused a decrease and an increase in corn P content when applied to clay and sandy soils (as in our system), respectively. However, more typical are observations of decreased plant yields and P concentrations (e.g., Rengasamy et al 1980;Heil and Barbarick 1989;Ippolito et al 1999;Codling et al 2002;Oladeji et al 2007). …”
Section: Infiltration Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the end of 2011 the area of agricultural soils in China contaminated with heavy metals reached one fifth of the total cultivated land area and resulted in a total reduction in grain output of over one billion tonnes (Xi et al 2011). Sewage sludge application to agricultural land is a worldwide practice combining sludge disposal and benefits to soils and plants including soil physical properties (Moodley and Hughes 2005), increasing soil organic matter content (Rengasamy et al 1980;USEPA 1983), and supplying major and trace plant nutrients (Heil and Barbarick 1989;Basta et al Address correspondence to Longhua Wu, Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 821, 71 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%