2017 IEEE Asia Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/apmc.2017.8251529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of selectivity and suppression level of a microstrip lowpass filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the lowpass filters are the stepped impedance ones, which selectivity is not sharp. In recent years, the microstrip lowpass filters with improved selectivity are reported in literature [27, 28]. According to these literature' data, the best roll‐off rate of the microstrip lowpass filter around the cutoff frequency of 2 GHz is 544dB/GHz, while the measured results of our fabricated filter provide a roll‐off rate of 6000dB/GHz.…”
Section: Computational and Design Examplesmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of the lowpass filters are the stepped impedance ones, which selectivity is not sharp. In recent years, the microstrip lowpass filters with improved selectivity are reported in literature [27, 28]. According to these literature' data, the best roll‐off rate of the microstrip lowpass filter around the cutoff frequency of 2 GHz is 544dB/GHz, while the measured results of our fabricated filter provide a roll‐off rate of 6000dB/GHz.…”
Section: Computational and Design Examplesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…According to these literature' data, the best roll‐off rate of the microstrip lowpass filter around the cutoff frequency of 2 GHz is 544dB/GHz, while the measured results of our fabricated filter provide a roll‐off rate of 6000dB/GHz. The out‐of‐band rejection levels in [27, 28] are below 40dB, while our filter has a rejection level of 60dB. The insertion loss at edge frequency was not presented in these literature and bound to be greater than 1.7dB as the microstrip resonator generally has poor unloaded quality factor of around 100 due to its compact size.…”
Section: Computational and Design Examplesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the last decade, researchers have concentrated on using bandpass filters [8][9][10][11][12][13] and lowpass filters [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] as an effective method to produce a high-performance Gysel power divider. In refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%