2020
DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2020.1836049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of microwave emissivity parameterization of frozen Arctic soils using roughness measurements derived from photogrammetry

Abstract: Soil emissivity of Arctic regions is a key parameter for assessing surface properties from microwave brightness temperature (Tb) measurements. Particularly in winter, frozen soil permittivity and roughness are two poorly characterized unknowns that must be considered. Here, we show that after removing snow, the 3D soil roughness can be accurately inferred from in-situ photogrammetry using Structure from Motion (SfM). We focus on using SfM techniques to provide accurate roughness measurements and improve emissi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also enables measurements of layer boundary roughness, particularly of the snowair and snow-ground interfaces. Other methods to characterize snow-air surface roughness use photographic image contrast analysis of dark boards placed behind snow (Fassnacht et al, 2009;Anttila et al, 2014) and subnivean roughness of areas cleared of snow using pin profilers, lidar scanning (Chabot et al, 2018;Roy et al, 2018), or structure from motion photogrammetry (Meloche et al, 2020). The subnivean roughness between snow and soil gives significant contributions of rough surface scattering because of the contrast of dielectric constants between snow and soil.…”
Section: Planning a Satellite Missionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also enables measurements of layer boundary roughness, particularly of the snowair and snow-ground interfaces. Other methods to characterize snow-air surface roughness use photographic image contrast analysis of dark boards placed behind snow (Fassnacht et al, 2009;Anttila et al, 2014) and subnivean roughness of areas cleared of snow using pin profilers, lidar scanning (Chabot et al, 2018;Roy et al, 2018), or structure from motion photogrammetry (Meloche et al, 2020). The subnivean roughness between snow and soil gives significant contributions of rough surface scattering because of the contrast of dielectric constants between snow and soil.…”
Section: Planning a Satellite Missionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3b) and (4) in Vargel et al (2020) with the improved Born approximation (IBA-Exp) configuration. Soil emission was simulated using the Wegmüller and Mätzler (1999) model with permittivity and roughness values from a field study of frozen soil emission based in CB (Meloche et al, 2020). The soil parameters from CB (Meloche et al, 2020) closely match values from a study in TVC (King et al, 2018) and were used for both site simulations.…”
Section: Measured Brightness Temperatures and Snowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also enables measurements of layer boundary roughness, particularly of the snow-air and snow-ground interfaces. Other methods to characterise snow-air surface roughness use photographic image contrast analysis of dark boards placed behind snow (Fassnacht et al, 2009;Anttila et al, 2014) and subnivean roughness of areas cleared of snow using pin profilers, LiDAR scanning (Chabot et al, 2018;Roy et al, 2018) or structure from motion photogrammetry (Meloche et al, 2020). The subnivean roughness between snow and soil give significant contributions of rough surface scattering because of the contrast of dielectric constants between snow and soil.…”
Section: Spatial Variability Of Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%