2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of impaired electrical activity in NPC1 mutant cortical neurons upon DHPG stimulation detected by micro-electrode array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing several methodological aspects of MEA experiments, many of the commonly reported methods appear adequate for estimating firing activity within in vitro neuronal cultures, while other elements of MEA experimental design and analysis have either been underreported in the literature or investigators have employed techniques that may be inappropriate for the task. Specifically, recording duration of 20 min or longer as reported by several studies (Kuperstein et al, 2010;McConnell et al, 2012;Vincent et al, 2013;Slomowitz et al, 2015;Black et al, 2018;Feng et al, 2018), appear sufficiently long to capture the activity in individual arrays with a high degree of reproducibility. Similarly, the common practice of performing experiments with primary cultures that have been aged two to three weeks is reasonable, since the primary rat cortical cultures examined here showed a high degree of spontaneous firing by the end of the first week that plateaued through these time frames.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing several methodological aspects of MEA experiments, many of the commonly reported methods appear adequate for estimating firing activity within in vitro neuronal cultures, while other elements of MEA experimental design and analysis have either been underreported in the literature or investigators have employed techniques that may be inappropriate for the task. Specifically, recording duration of 20 min or longer as reported by several studies (Kuperstein et al, 2010;McConnell et al, 2012;Vincent et al, 2013;Slomowitz et al, 2015;Black et al, 2018;Feng et al, 2018), appear sufficiently long to capture the activity in individual arrays with a high degree of reproducibility. Similarly, the common practice of performing experiments with primary cultures that have been aged two to three weeks is reasonable, since the primary rat cortical cultures examined here showed a high degree of spontaneous firing by the end of the first week that plateaued through these time frames.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to disease models based on genetic manipulation of healthy neuronal cultures, this approach is clearly more suitable for modeling genetic disorders. Examples of neurological disorders which have been modeled on MEAs by isolating and culturing neuronal cultures from rodents carrying specific pathogenic mutations include Autosomal Dominant Sleep-related Hypermotor Epilepsy (ADSHE) [228,255] (formerly known as Autosomal Dominant Nocturnal Frontal Lobe Epilepsy, ADNFLE), Epilepsy Aphasia Syndromes (EAS) [235], PCDH19-Clustering Epilepsy (PCDH19-CE) [234], ASD [237], FXS [240,241], and Niemann-Pick Type C1 (NPC1) disease [242].…”
Section: Disease Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once established, MEA-based disease models can be used as a point of reference for phenotypic rescue experiments using genetic interventions or other pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Indeed, in the majority of the studies cited in the previous paragraph, researchers took advantage of their newly established disease models on MEAs to test both well-known and candidate treatments strategies aiming to improve, or ideally reverse, the pathophysiological phenotype as defined by the analysis of MEA recordings [148,158,223,225,228,241,242].…”
Section: Drug Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) technology is a well-established tool to study how cellular composition, connectivity, genetic, and epigenetic expression correlate with the functional electrical activity expressed by in-vitro neuronal models [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. MEAs applicability ranges from drug/toxicological screening [ 1 , 5 , 9 ] to the characterization of various neuronal disorders [ 3 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. In particular, with the introduction of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and differentiation protocols, human-derived neuronal models could be created, potentially making the in-vitro approach more reliable and representative of in-vivo conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%