IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 2001 Digest. Held in Conjunction With: USNC/URSI National Radio
DOI: 10.1109/aps.2001.959390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of elevation directivity for ESPAR antennas with finite ground plane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ground skirting is used to reduce the radiation lobe elevation that exists due to the finite ground plane dimensions [9], [10]. Indoors, ceilings often provide unobstructed reflections, thus reducing the main-lobe elevation not only increases the azimuth gain, but also reduces the likelihood of multipath interference.…”
Section: Espar Antenna Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground skirting is used to reduce the radiation lobe elevation that exists due to the finite ground plane dimensions [9], [10]. Indoors, ceilings often provide unobstructed reflections, thus reducing the main-lobe elevation not only increases the azimuth gain, but also reduces the likelihood of multipath interference.…”
Section: Espar Antenna Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally considered effective to increase the ground plane size significantly if tilt is avoided in order to obtain radiation elevation toward the horizontal direction. In the ESPAR antenna case, there is a way to realize horizontal radiation with a limited ground plane size by making the ground plane in a cylindrical skirt shape (with a radius of a half-wavelength and height of a quarter-wavelength) [14,24].…”
Section: Finite Ground Plane and Equivalent Steering Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce optimization time, element structural variables were kept within limits that were determined by available material and the overall size of the antenna. The monopole elements were kept at 1 mm radius while the ground skirt was assumed a two-dimensional shape (0 mm thickness) in the simulation process as this parameter was assumed not to significantly influence the behavior of the antenna [8].…”
Section: A Structural Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%