2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of chitosan production from Persian Gulf shrimp waste by response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant influence of the NaOH concentration on the yield extraction has been shown (p ≥0.05). Our results are similar to those obtained by Ahing et al (2016) [12] and slightly lower than those obtained by Nouri et al [4]. Differences in yield extraction can be due to the difference of the extraction conditions, precisely, time and temperature of deacetylation [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No significant influence of the NaOH concentration on the yield extraction has been shown (p ≥0.05). Our results are similar to those obtained by Ahing et al (2016) [12] and slightly lower than those obtained by Nouri et al [4]. Differences in yield extraction can be due to the difference of the extraction conditions, precisely, time and temperature of deacetylation [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Gelatin, a polypeptide extracted from fish skins, offers various functional properties such as film-forming, gelling and emulsifying properties and can be applied in several fields like food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry [2].On the other hand, chitosan, a polysaccharide derived from chitin can be extracted from crustaceans shells, especially shrimps, is widely studied for its excellent functional and biological properties, and has various applications in several fields such as wastewater treatment, food, pharmaceutical, textile and cosmetic industry [3].Therefore, the valorization of these by-products can represent an important eco-friendly alternative that allow, in addition to reducing the environmental impact, the enhancement of creativity, competitiveness and productivity of companies. Despite that extraction and characterization of these two biopolymers have been already studied by several authors all over the world [4][5][6], to the best of our knowledge, studies at national level are inexistent. Moreover, data obtained from other authors cannot be extrapolated due to the specificity and characteristics of each raw material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also odorless and in a form of crystalline flakes. The characteristic of the chitosan produced from this study was similar to the chitosan obtained from previous studies which was slightly brownish to white and yellowish white and this indicates a good quality of chitosan was produced (Naznin, 2005;Nouri et al, 2016). …”
Section: The Produced Chitosansupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Other study which is done by Abdou et al (2008) the DDA value of chitosan obtained was up to 90% by performing the deacetylation in an autoclave, while Al Sagheer et al (2009) reported that the chitosan DDA obtained from shrimp shell waste in Arabian Gulf ranged from 88-94% by using traditional method. Nouri et al (2016) also obtained DDA value ranged from 71.02-82.20% for deacetylation using traditional method, while 79.01-88.60% for using microwave method. Besides, Alishahi et al (2011) also performed deacetylation by using microwave and obtained chitosan with DDA value ranged from 87.5 -93%.…”
Section: Degree Of Deacetylation (Dda)mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation