2015 7th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icmic.2015.7409352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved threshold denoising method based on wavelet transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the two different examples (Figures 5–8 and Figure 9) to show and compare the denoised results. The SUREShrink and Minimax methods are the optimized hybrid scale dependent threshold selection schemes in the current literature [24], [48], whereas other newer methods [9], [37]–[39] use a thresholding function other than hard and soft in an effort to obtain better denoising. Filtering methods are not compared with the new method because standard wavelet denoising methods perform better than them as shown in ESR [30] and in general [24], [25].…”
Section: Esr Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We used the two different examples (Figures 5–8 and Figure 9) to show and compare the denoised results. The SUREShrink and Minimax methods are the optimized hybrid scale dependent threshold selection schemes in the current literature [24], [48], whereas other newer methods [9], [37]–[39] use a thresholding function other than hard and soft in an effort to obtain better denoising. Filtering methods are not compared with the new method because standard wavelet denoising methods perform better than them as shown in ESR [30] and in general [24], [25].…”
Section: Esr Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the results of non-soft and non-hard thresholding function methods [9], [37]–[39] were similar for example 2, and hence, only Zhang and Song’s method [39] is shown. As can be seen, the current state-of-the-art methods are either not very effective at removing baseline noise and/or they distort the signal peak heights.…”
Section: Esr Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study uses Mallet algorithm for wavelet decomposition [9]. Assuming that X(n) is heart sound signal mixed with Gauss white noise, S(n) is the original heart sound signal, and e(n) represents the white noise N(0,1), thus X(n)=S(n)+e(n).…”
Section: Mallet Wavelet Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%