2021
DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-20-0145.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved SSM/I Thin Ice Algorithm with Ice Type Discrimination in Coastal Polynyas

Abstract: Long-term quantification of sea ice production in coastal polynyas (thin sea ice areas) is an important issue to understand the global overturning circulation and its changes. The Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I), which has nearly 30 years of observation, is a powerful tool for that purpose owing to its ability to detect thin ice areas. However, previous SSM/I thin ice thickness algorithms differ between regions, probably due to the difference in dominant type of thin sea ice in each region. In this stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thin SIT is also now routinely estimated from passive microwaves at 1.4 GHz (Kaleschke et al., 2016). Efforts are also conducted to estimate thin SIT with higher frequencies (18 and 36 GHz) (e.g., Yoshizawa et al., 2018 or Kashiwase et al., 2021). However, evaluation of the potential of the PMW observations to estimate the SIT for the full thickness range has not triggered yet much efforts, as PMW observations are not expected to penetrate the ice for more than 50 cm, and to be directly sensitive to the thicker sea ice, especially at high frequency (Heygster et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thin SIT is also now routinely estimated from passive microwaves at 1.4 GHz (Kaleschke et al., 2016). Efforts are also conducted to estimate thin SIT with higher frequencies (18 and 36 GHz) (e.g., Yoshizawa et al., 2018 or Kashiwase et al., 2021). However, evaluation of the potential of the PMW observations to estimate the SIT for the full thickness range has not triggered yet much efforts, as PMW observations are not expected to penetrate the ice for more than 50 cm, and to be directly sensitive to the thicker sea ice, especially at high frequency (Heygster et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one improved approach, Kashiwase et al. (2019, 2021) developed an algorithm that accounts for three types of thin sea ice (active frazil, thin solid ice, and a mixture of two types).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more accurate estimates of sea ice production, these error sources need to be taken into account in the thin ice thickness algorithm in future. As one improved approach, Kashiwase et al (2019Kashiwase et al ( , 2021 developed an algorithm that accounts for three types of thin sea ice (active frazil, thin solid ice, and a mixture of two types).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underwater frazil ice formation prevents heat-insulating surface-cover ice from forming, thereby enabling efficient ice production. A thin ice algorithm that detects active frazil, a mixture of frazil/pancake ice and open water, has been developed for AMSR-E (Nakata et al, 2019) and SSM/I (Kashiwase et al, 2021), which provides a more accurate estimation of sea ice formation. Figure 2B shows the updated map of sea ice formation based on that algorithm.…”
Section: Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%