Interspeech 2021 2021
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2021-2246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Speech Separation with Time-and-Frequency Cross-Domain Feature Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5, the spectrogram of separated speech by the DPHA-Net is more closer to clean speech comparing with the Gated-DPRNN and DPRNN. Table 4 lists the results of the DPHA-Net and 7 compared methods on the Libri2Mix dataset: DANET [10], Conv-TasNet [15], SANet [8], GCD-TasNet [49], DPRNN [19], DPTNet [20], A-FRCNN [17]. As we can seen, in general, the proposed DPHA-Net is superior to compared methods but slightly less than the A-FRCNN.…”
Section: A Comparison Between Dpha-net With Previous Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, the spectrogram of separated speech by the DPHA-Net is more closer to clean speech comparing with the Gated-DPRNN and DPRNN. Table 4 lists the results of the DPHA-Net and 7 compared methods on the Libri2Mix dataset: DANET [10], Conv-TasNet [15], SANet [8], GCD-TasNet [49], DPRNN [19], DPTNet [20], A-FRCNN [17]. As we can seen, in general, the proposed DPHA-Net is superior to compared methods but slightly less than the A-FRCNN.…”
Section: A Comparison Between Dpha-net With Previous Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%