2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-0857-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved sensitivity of the urine CAA lateral-flow assay for diagnosing active Schistosoma infections by using larger sample volumes

Abstract: BackgroundAccurate determination of Schistosoma infection rates in low endemic regions to examine progress towards interruption of transmission and elimination requires highly sensitive diagnostic tools. An existing lateral flow (LF) based test demonstrating ongoing infections through detection of worm circulating anodic antigen (CAA), was improved for sensitivity through implementation of a protocol allowing increased sample input. Urine is the preferred sample as collection is non-invasive and sample volume … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
100
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(46 reference statements)
2
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several population-based studies in Tanzania and Uganda, which included both men and women, did not find an increased prevalence of HIV among those with S. mansoni infection. 5,6 Neither of these studies stratified data by gender, and both relied on schistosome egg excretion as the primary endpoint, which is less sensitive than schistosome antigen testing 7 and may be diminished in the setting of HIV infection. 8,9 Of note, in a subset of the Ugandan individuals who underwent urine schistosome antigen testing, the odds ratio (OR) for HIV infection was 1.5 with a P value of 0.19, suggesting that the study may have lacked sufficient power to detect a smaller increased risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several population-based studies in Tanzania and Uganda, which included both men and women, did not find an increased prevalence of HIV among those with S. mansoni infection. 5,6 Neither of these studies stratified data by gender, and both relied on schistosome egg excretion as the primary endpoint, which is less sensitive than schistosome antigen testing 7 and may be diminished in the setting of HIV infection. 8,9 Of note, in a subset of the Ugandan individuals who underwent urine schistosome antigen testing, the odds ratio (OR) for HIV infection was 1.5 with a P value of 0.19, suggesting that the study may have lacked sufficient power to detect a smaller increased risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urine samples were tested with the UCAA50 assay as described elsewhere . For the standard CAA50 assay, urine samples were extracted with an equal volume of 4% w/v trichloroacetic acid (TCA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate efficacy, we measured active schistosome infections by identifying schistosome eggs in feces of infected baboons by the standard Kato‐Katz method of microscopy . We also assessed the efficacy of both PZQ and the Sm‐p80 vaccine through detection of circulating anodic antigen (CAA) in host urine; quantification of CAA antigens levels has been shown to be highly specific and reliable at determining the effects of drug treatment, worm burden, and egg production . We further analyzed the transcriptomic profiles and molecular mechanisms associated with trickle infection, chronic schistosomiasis, PZQ‐mediated parasite killing, and Sm‐p80 vaccine effect following re‐encounter with the parasite .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced sensitivity of this UCP-LF CAA strip testis achieved utilizing centrifugal filtration devices which permit larger sample input. The analysis of a sample volume of 0.5 ml serum or 2 ml urine is believed to allow detection of single worm infections [15]; these two assays are referred to respectively as the SCAA500 and UCAA2000 test, with ‘S’ indicting serum, ‘U’ urine and the number the amount of sample (in μl) concentrated and analyzed on the strip. The amount of sample input is flexible, but relates directly to the achieved analytical sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%