2019
DOI: 10.1080/0952813x.2019.1572659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved salp swarm algorithm based on weight factor and adaptive mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…e target state given in the initial frame in target tracking is shown in equation (5), where x i , y i is the upper left corner of the target Ground Truth, and w i , h i denote the width and height of the tracked target, respectively. e real value given in the initial frame is used as the initialized positive sample of the tracked target, while the negative sample is obtained by random sampling around the real position.…”
Section: Adaptive Scale Target Tracking Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e target state given in the initial frame in target tracking is shown in equation (5), where x i , y i is the upper left corner of the target Ground Truth, and w i , h i denote the width and height of the tracked target, respectively. e real value given in the initial frame is used as the initialized positive sample of the tracked target, while the negative sample is obtained by random sampling around the real position.…”
Section: Adaptive Scale Target Tracking Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because visual target tracking technology has more outstanding advantages and wide applications than detection and recognition in the field of computer vision, it has attracted a wave of research from industry and scholars in recent years. However, many challenges in its research have plagued many researchers, such as illumination changes, scale changes, fast deformation, motion blur, background mottling, and target occlusion, which can affect tracker performance [5]. For target tracking systems, tracker performance is not only affected by the degree of model merit but is also related to the variation of the target itself and the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All function dimensions were 30, and the scope selected in the range of [-1,1]. Compared algorithms in this paper selected butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA) [64], Grey Wolf Optimizer [65], the lé vy-flight salp swarm algorithm (LSSA) [66], sine cosine algorithm (SCA) [67], salp swarm algorithm (SSA) [68], improved SSA based on weight factor and adaptive mutation (WASSA) [69], whale optimization algorithm (WOA) [70]. BOA was proposed by Arora and Singh, modular modality c selected 0.01 and power exponent a selected from 0.1 to 0.3.…”
Section: Cec Test Suits Experiments Aexperimental Parameters and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSA has only one main controlling parameter, so it is simple and easy to implement. However, like other swarm-based algorithms, SSA has the insufficiencies of low convergence precision and slow convergence speed when dealing with highdimensional complex optimization problems [23]. In the classical SSA optimization process, global exploration and local exploitation are a pair of contradictions.…”
Section: Performance Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%