2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Quality of Thyroid Ultrasound Reports After Implementation of the ACR Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Nodule Lexicon and Risk Stratification System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
22
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They compared the completeness and consistency of thyroid ultrasound reports before and after the implementation of the ACR TI-RADS and concluded that the use of a structured reporting template improved the quality of these reports significantly [21]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They compared the completeness and consistency of thyroid ultrasound reports before and after the implementation of the ACR TI-RADS and concluded that the use of a structured reporting template improved the quality of these reports significantly [21]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative impact of incomplete reporting on timely cytological diagnosis and surgical intervention has been documented [19, 20]. Nevertheless, Griffin et al [21] proved recently, in a three-phase study, that simple implementation of the ACR TI-RADS structured reporting template improved the quality significantly. Therefore, more studies are required to continuously and objectively evaluate the value of these reports at different facilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auch Griffin et al konnten zeigen, dass selbst erfahrene Sonografeure vor Einführung eines standardisierten Befundungssystems wichtige Malignitätskriterien (Form, Randbegrenzung) häufig nicht in die Befundung einfließen ließen. Erst unter Verwendung einer strukturierten Befundvorlage wurden alle entscheidenden Kriterien adressiert [14]. Dies widerspricht dem Anspruch, Patienten und Zuweisern angemessen konkrete Angaben zur Wahrscheinlichkeit eines Malignoms zu bieten.…”
Section: Warum Strukturiert Und Standardisiert Befunden?unclassified
“…The ACR TI-RADS developed a predictive model that assigned different risk scores to each suspicious ultrasound feature and determined the TI-RADS category of nodules by allocating points to more suspicious features and summing the total score (20)(21)(22)(23). ACR TI-RADS 3 assessment assesses lesions with a malignancy of less than 5% and ACR TI-RADS 4 assessment for lesions with a malignant risk, ranging from 5% to 20% (24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%