SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1190/segam2016-13858769.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved principal component analysis for 3D seismic data simultaneous reconstruction and denoising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first reconstruction approach (shown as 'Approach 1' in the results section (Section 4)) follows the commonly used statistical decomposition-based reconstruction, which often is implemented using the PCA approach to link two geophysical fields, for example see [73][74][75][76].…”
Section: Data Reconstruction-approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first reconstruction approach (shown as 'Approach 1' in the results section (Section 4)) follows the commonly used statistical decomposition-based reconstruction, which often is implemented using the PCA approach to link two geophysical fields, for example see [73][74][75][76].…”
Section: Data Reconstruction-approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microseismic data can also be denoised using multichannel methods, which are widely used in the activesource seismic community, such as predictive filtering methods (Liu et al, 2012;Liu and Chen 2013), singular spectrum analysis (Huang et al, 2015(Huang et al, , 2016aZhang et al, 2016a;Zhang et al, 2016b;Zhang et al, 2016c), low-rank approximation based methods (Huang et al, 2016b;Xie et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2017;Zhou and Zhang 2017;Bai et al, 2018), dictionary learning-based methods (Chen 2017;Siahsar et al, 2017;Wu and Bai 2018a, b), and morphological filtering based method (Huang et al, 2017). The multichannel denoising methods rely on a fairly dense spatial sampling of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state-of-the-art denoising algorithms include transforming domain thresholding methods (Candes et al, 2006), singular spectrum analysis (Vautard et al, 1992), lowrank-approximation-based methods (Huang et al, 2016), dictionary-learning-based methods (Elad and Aharon, 2006), empirical-mode-decomposition and empirical-mode-decompositionlike methods (Huang et al, 1998), etc. Denoising microseismic data will inevitably cause useful small-amplitude signal damage, which degrades the fidelity of the processed data (Li et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019). Moreover, the damaged waveform amplitude will greatly affect the subsequent source localization and mechanism analysis (Maxwell et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%