2010
DOI: 10.1021/ef1005836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Prediction of Hydrocarbon Flash Points from Boiling Point Data

Abstract: Flash points (T FP ) of hydrocarbons are calculated from their flash point numbers, N FP , with the relationshipIn turn, the N FP values can be predicted from experimental boiling point numbers (Y BP ) and molecular structure with the equationwhere D is the number of olefinic double bonds in the structure, T is the number of triple bonds, and B is the number of aromatic rings. For a data set consisting of 300 diverse hydrocarbons, the average absolute deviation between the literature and predicted flash points… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(14 reference statements)
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sim ilar regression for 2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethylnonane based on data from Korosi and Kovats [24] predicts that the value of surface ten sion at 21.2°C should be 24.2mN m-1, which agrees with the data reported herein of 24.1 ± 0.2 mN mT1. The flashpoint value of 135 ± 1 °C for hexadecane agrees with the reported values of 134 ± 2 and 135 °C [26,27], and the flashpoint value of 94 ± 2 °C for 2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethylnonane agrees with the reported val ues of 95 and 96 °C [28,29].The flash point and surface tension values are given in Table 7, Annex. As the volume fraction of isocetane increases, the surface tension (Fig.…”
Section: Fig 4 S U Rfa C E Te N S Io N O F M Ix Tu Re S O F Is O C supporting
confidence: 84%
“…A sim ilar regression for 2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethylnonane based on data from Korosi and Kovats [24] predicts that the value of surface ten sion at 21.2°C should be 24.2mN m-1, which agrees with the data reported herein of 24.1 ± 0.2 mN mT1. The flashpoint value of 135 ± 1 °C for hexadecane agrees with the reported values of 134 ± 2 and 135 °C [26,27], and the flashpoint value of 94 ± 2 °C for 2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethylnonane agrees with the reported val ues of 95 and 96 °C [28,29].The flash point and surface tension values are given in Table 7, Annex. As the volume fraction of isocetane increases, the surface tension (Fig.…”
Section: Fig 4 S U Rfa C E Te N S Io N O F M Ix Tu Re S O F Is O C supporting
confidence: 84%
“…We collected data from academic papers, the Gelest chemical catalogue, the DIPPR database, Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, the Hazardous Chemicals Handbook, and the PubChem chemical database . Basic properties of the flash point datasets from each paper (size, average, and standard deviation) are given in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons were made to the best model from each paper. The primary papers that we compared against can be divided into two categories with respect to their testing: The first category used an 80 % training 20 % test splitting method (“80/20 split” papers) without providing the exact test set. Note that we used Katrziky07’s ANN dataset partitioning method as we compared to their ANN modeling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the present study is to investigate the ways which can improve the predictability of FP with QSPR method. The main focus would be on a more efficient strategy to select the descriptors and find the relationship between the FP and model inputs as well as considering a combination of selected descriptors and NBP as model inputs which has been found to be an efficient way to remarkably enhance the FP predictability ,,,. Using a combination of experimentally determined properties and calculated molecular descriptors as model inputs and improving the variable selection and relationship mapping efficiency studied in the current work, not only can result in a more accurate prediction of the FP as an important flammability property, but also can be used to improve the performance of QSPR in predicting other properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%