2012
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Mos1-mediated transgenesis in C. elegans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
471
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 407 publications
(480 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
471
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a homologous repair event guided by a coinjected DNA plasmid occurs at a lower frequency than repair from an ssOligo template, requiring that both a selection and a counterselection be utilized. That approach leaves a genetic marker near the endogenous locus and is significantly slower than the approach we used, requiring weeks rather than days to recover the insertion (Frokjaer-Jensen et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, a homologous repair event guided by a coinjected DNA plasmid occurs at a lower frequency than repair from an ssOligo template, requiring that both a selection and a counterselection be utilized. That approach leaves a genetic marker near the endogenous locus and is significantly slower than the approach we used, requiring weeks rather than days to recover the insertion (Frokjaer-Jensen et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a homologous repair event guided by a coinjected DNA plasmid occurs at a lower frequency than repair from an ssOligo template, requiring that both a selection and a counterselection be utilized. That approach leaves a genetic marker near the endogenous locus and is significantly slower than the approach we used, requiring weeks rather than days to recover the insertion (Frokjaer-Jensen et al 2012).Because the insertion strategy permits endogenous changes to occur at some distance from the DSB, it provides flexibility in target selection to avoid complications arising from DNA features needed for nuclease target recognition. Both TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 have specific, although remarkably minimal, constraints for site recognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain a common genetic background, control smn-1(+) animals were similarly derived from +/hT2 parents. Plasmid pHA#582 contains a 1,819-bp fragment corresponding to the smn-1 promoter, coding sequence, and 3′ untranslated region subcloned as an AflII/XhoI product into pCFJ356 (Addgene plasmid 34871) (85). Primers for amplification were as follows: 5-tgatcttaagtctacgagcgacattcatcg and 5-tgatctcgagcagcctctcatcctgattgc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primers for amplification were as follows: 5-tgatcttaagtctacgagcgacattcatcg and 5-tgatctcgagcagcctctcatcctgattgc. rtSi9[Cb-unc-119(+)]IV and rtSi10 [smn-1p::smn-1;Cb-unc-119(+)]IV transgenes were generated by Mos1-mediated single-copy insertion (85,86). We injected 50 ng/μL of targeting plasmid (pCFJ356 or pHA#582) into EG6703 [unc-119(ed3)III;cxTi10816 IV] animals along with 50 ng/μL pCFJ601 (eft-3p::Mos1 transposase), 10 ng/μL pGH8 (rab-3p::mCherry), 5 ng/μL pCFJ104 (myo-3p::mCherry), and 2.5 ng/μL pCFJ90 (myo-2p::mCherry).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reporter constructs are either injected into embryos to generate stable transformants (Venken and Bellen, 2007;Tasic et al, 2011;Frokjaer-Jensen et al, 2012), or electroporated (Funahashi and Nakamura, 2008;Vierra and Irvine, 2012), to observe the transient effect of the construct. In most cases, these small DNA fragments are sufficient to provide coherent functions in vivo.…”
Section: Interactions Between Regulatory Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%