2008
DOI: 10.3357/asem.2166.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Military Air Traffic Controller Selection Methods as Measured by Subsequent Training Performance

Abstract: Results suggested training attrition could be reduced by raising the current ASVAB minimum qualifying score. However, this approach may make it difficult to identify sufficient numbers of trainees and lead to adverse impact. Although the AT-SAT ATC work sample subtest showed incremental validity to the ASVAB, its length (95 min) may be problematic in operational testing. Recommendations are made for additional studies to address issues affecting operational implementation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…any single feature in assessment of complex human behavioural performance is a relatively weak predictor, what underscores the need to carefully combine multimodal features in the ATC selection process. Therefore, the need to combine different multimodal features is logical step forward in enhancement of ATC selection protocols, in order to minimise relatively high attrition rates during the training period before full ATC qualification, which can reach and exceed 30% in both civilian and military settings [3], [90], [91]. Proposed multimodal and multidimensional ATC performance space and its extensions with the most pertinent bio-neuro-psycho-social features should be an important step forward to comprehensive multidisciplinary selection process, which has to take into account discriminative power of each feature and its cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…any single feature in assessment of complex human behavioural performance is a relatively weak predictor, what underscores the need to carefully combine multimodal features in the ATC selection process. Therefore, the need to combine different multimodal features is logical step forward in enhancement of ATC selection protocols, in order to minimise relatively high attrition rates during the training period before full ATC qualification, which can reach and exceed 30% in both civilian and military settings [3], [90], [91]. Proposed multimodal and multidimensional ATC performance space and its extensions with the most pertinent bio-neuro-psycho-social features should be an important step forward to comprehensive multidisciplinary selection process, which has to take into account discriminative power of each feature and its cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided by theoretical empirical findings, this analysis includes 15 independent variables and one dependent variable (Table 2). Variable selection was guided by previous studies examining military factors to academic success and completion of service members in military training programs (Carretta & King, 2008; Dunai & Porter, 2001; Fulton, Starnes, Caouette, Whittaker, & Ivanitskaya, 2008; Grant et al, 2012; Jordon & Curtis, 2010; Meadows, Stanton, Styles, & Finstuen, 2002).…”
Section: Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparing the two verbal subtests, previous research generally suggests that they have relatively comparable levels of predictive validity. For example, the two subtests have been found to perform similarly when predicting outcomes of training test performance and graduation from air traffic controller training (Carretta & King, 2008), mechanical hands-on performance (Carey, 1994), military technical school grade (Abrahams, Pass, Kusulas, Cole, & Kieckhaefer, 1993), and final school grade (DMDC, 2006). Alternatively, Earles and Ree (1992) found that WK is a slightly better predictor of course grades than PC across a variety of job types.…”
Section: Predictive Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mirroring the research on the two verbal subtests, it is not clear which of the two math subtests possesses more predictive ability. Carretta and King (2008) found that AR and MK were similarly predictive of air traffic controller training performance and graduation from the training program, and DMDC (2006) found the two subtests to have similar validity when predicting final school grade. Abrahams et al (1993) also found comparable validity coefficients between the two math subtests on average; however, the regression weight was larger for MK than AR when predicting final school grade.…”
Section: Predictive Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%