“… 7 These results directly suggest that good positioning and deployment of the anchor requires specialised skills and a trained team, with experts suggesting a multiplanar approach for hostile necks. 3 , 5 However, the design of these studies did not integrate the long term cyclic load, but focused on traction resistance that results in exposure to forces much higher than in vivo forces and did not integrate the arterial cyclic load, which created the lesions observed. However, it is worth considering that optimal EA deployment achieves good aorto–graft apposition, reinforcing the suggestion of the protective effect of EAs even with continued aortic neck dilatation, 3 , 8 which may be an effect of both static (radial force) and cyclic (haemodynamic) loading.…”