2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved melting of latent heat storage via porous medium and uniform Joule heat generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, a major concern for the LHTES system is PCM's minimal thermal Energies 2021, 14, 7179 2 of 23 efficiency, which decreases the phase change rate [14][15][16][17]. Researchers developed several techniques to improve the heat transfer rate of such systems, including the expansion of the heat transfer surface area [18][19][20], adding micro or nano-sized particles [21][22][23][24], using cascade layer PCM [25], encapsulation techniques [26,27], changing the location of the heat transfer fluid (HTF) channel [28][29][30], fins combinations [31][32][33], conductive foams [34][35][36], and using magnetic fields [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, a major concern for the LHTES system is PCM's minimal thermal Energies 2021, 14, 7179 2 of 23 efficiency, which decreases the phase change rate [14][15][16][17]. Researchers developed several techniques to improve the heat transfer rate of such systems, including the expansion of the heat transfer surface area [18][19][20], adding micro or nano-sized particles [21][22][23][24], using cascade layer PCM [25], encapsulation techniques [26,27], changing the location of the heat transfer fluid (HTF) channel [28][29][30], fins combinations [31][32][33], conductive foams [34][35][36], and using magnetic fields [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key drawback that requires substantial consideration is the low rate of thermal transition during phase transition, owing to the comparatively weak thermal properties of the most present-day PCMs. Some feasible suggestions for resolving the issue involve the proper design of containment system able to deliver a proper thermal transport from the heat transfer fluid (HTF) to the store material, and the application of relevant heat-transfer enhancers such as metal nanoparticles [1][2][3][4][5][6], fin arrays [7][8][9][10], and porous foams [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Different methods have been developed to improve PCM characteristics, including fins deployment, 7,8 incorporating design features in air conditioning ducts, 9 heat pipes, 10 multi-tube usages in shell and tube heat exchangers, 11 encapsulated PCMs in microencapsulation 12 in larger-scale capsules, 13 molten salt capsules, 14 direct contact heat transfer enhancement by convective transport. 15 Some other improvement methods are enlarging the temperature variation between the heating source and the PCMs, 16 localized heat generation inside the PCM, 17 using nanomaterials in the PCM, 18 and deployment of the extended surface heat transfer by inserting fibrous materials such as carbon fiber brushes and carbon nanofibre, 19,20 use of expanded graphite foam, 21,22 and the use of metal foams. 23,24 The high thermal conductive porous medium approach significantly improves PCM-based heat exchangers' thermal performance as the porous medium has great thermal conductivity, high porosity, and high thermal surface area with negligible effect on the storage capacity 25 using metal or graphite foams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%