16th International Electric Propulsion Conference 1982
DOI: 10.2514/6.1982-1928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved ion containment using a ring-cusp ion thruster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was not possible to create the 0.3 T magnetic fields now found at the pole pieces of some multipole designs. 12 The improved performance of these designs suggests that some redirection of ion currents is indeed occurring. In any case, the uniform ion current distribution of low field strength multipole thrusters is clearly demonstrated here.…”
Section: Existing Thruster Designsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was not possible to create the 0.3 T magnetic fields now found at the pole pieces of some multipole designs. 12 The improved performance of these designs suggests that some redirection of ion currents is indeed occurring. In any case, the uniform ion current distribution of low field strength multipole thrusters is clearly demonstrated here.…”
Section: Existing Thruster Designsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using the density cited previously, Eq. (12) gives an ion current to the side wall of 1010 mA, whereas Eq. (13) gives a current of 40 mA.…”
Section: Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent development work on ion engine technology (Sovey 1982a, Rawlin 1982, and Sovey 1982b has focused on the use of noble gas propellants to circumvent the toxicity and spacecraft contamination issues presented by the use of mercury propellant. Our model, based partially upon a model created by Brophy et al (1989), is designed to reflect both theoretical performance predictions and laboratory data collected from ion engine tests.…”
Section: Electron Bombardment Ion Thrustermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parameter, which is proportional to the neutral density in the discharge chamber is defined by the expression m(\ -rj u ) where m is the propellant flow rate into the thruster and r/ M is the propellant utilization efficiency. It has been shown by Brophy 2 that the plasma ion energy cost is related to the neutral density parameter by the equation (3) In this equation the parameter e*, the baseline plasma ion energy cost, is the average energy required to produce an ion at high neutral densities. When the neutral density is sufficiently high, primary electrons are not lost directly to the anode, and the only losses associated with ion production are those related to atomic excitation reactions and Maxwellian electron energy losses to the anode.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%