All Days 2002
DOI: 10.2118/75171-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Hydrocarbon Recovery in the United Kingdom Continental Shelf: Past, Present and Future

Abstract: Gas production from the UKCS commenced in 1967 and oil production in 1975. The North Sea area is now very much a mature province with the large fields in the Southern, Central and Northern North Sea producing at significantly below their early plateau production rates. Here the drive is to maximise the overall economic hydrocarbon recovery from the province, by making the best use of the infrastructure that has been built up to bring in new discoveries and improve recovery from the mature fields. New areas (de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It originally contained approximately 2.4 × 10 8 m 3 (or 1.5 × 10 9 barrels) of oil (measured at surface conditions). Like most oilfields, one company operates the field (in this case BP with 85% equity) although it is co-owned by a number of other companies (in this case JX Nippon Exploration & Production (7.5%), Eni (UK) Ltd (5%) and Marubeni North Sea Ltd (2.5%)) [85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Enhanced Oil Recovery Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It originally contained approximately 2.4 × 10 8 m 3 (or 1.5 × 10 9 barrels) of oil (measured at surface conditions). Like most oilfields, one company operates the field (in this case BP with 85% equity) although it is co-owned by a number of other companies (in this case JX Nippon Exploration & Production (7.5%), Eni (UK) Ltd (5%) and Marubeni North Sea Ltd (2.5%)) [85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Enhanced Oil Recovery Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussions of current or planned IOR projects and technology requirements in the North Sea have already been presented. 5,12 In addition to the issue of what can be done offshore, the other issue that must be considered is implementation timing. Many studies have shown that various improved recovery processes are very sensitive to implementation timing, with recoveries being much better when the processes are implemented before a critical event such as before pressure falls below the bubble point or before water breakthrough occurs.…”
Section: Drilling and Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States where large volumes of CO 2 are readily available from natural sources, CO 2 has been injected as the primary recovery agent in these EOR operations. In Europe however the lack of availability of low cost CO 2 has meant that EOR operations have conventionally used water injection or methane gas injection, with currently no CO 2 EOR projects in an offshore environment. With the prospect of Carbon Capture technology developing across the EU however, the required volumes of CO 2 may become available through anthropogenic sources . CO 2 EOR is regarded as an option for storing large volumes of this captured CO 2 with the added benefit of improving the recovery rate from depleted oil fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%