Abstract:Background: Few empirical studies have validated the relation between medicolegal risk and hospital patient safety performance. We sought to determine whether there was a relation between in-hospital patient safety events and medicolegal cases involving Canadian physicians. Methods: In this ecological study, we used Poisson regression to compare data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database and the database of the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) of medicol… Show more
“…[24] Interestingly, only 2.8% of trauma centers had first-hand experience with a video analysisrelated medical-legal problem. Moreso, video review may even reduce medicolegal cases, as Yang et al [29] found a significant relation between patient safety and the risk of medicolegal involvement of physician in Canadian hospitals. In other words, video review may enhance patient safety, which may result in less medicolegal issues of physicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there are some recently described advanced methods available that could significantly ano[nymize] patients and personnel in the trauma room. In the study by Silas et al (29) videos of operating rooms during surgery were processed into point clouds. Recognition of staff by their colleagues was rated using a Likert scale, where the score of 1 was anonymous, (unable to identify) and a score of 10 was not anonymous, (easy to identify) The mean scores for unaltered and point cloud videos were 7.05 and 1.41, respectively (p < 0.001).…”
Introduction
A trauma resuscitation is dynamic and complex process in which failures could lead to serious adverse events. In several trauma centers, evaluation of trauma resuscitation is part of a hospital’s quality assessment program. While video analysis is commonly used, some hospitals use live observations, mainly due to ethical and medicolegal concerns. The aim of this study was to compare the validity and reliability of video analysis and live observations to evaluate trauma resuscitations.
Methods
In this prospective observational study, validity was assessed by comparing the observed adherence to 28 advanced trauma life support (ATLS) guideline related tasks by video analysis to life observations. Interobserver reliability was assessed by calculating the intra class coefficient of observed ATLS related tasks by live observations and video analysis.
Results
Eleven simulated and thirteen real-life resuscitations were assessed. Overall, the percentage of observed ATLS related tasks performed during simulated resuscitations was 10.4% (P < 0.001) higher when the same resuscitations were analysed using video compared to live observations. During real-life resuscitations, 8.7% (p < 0.001) more ATLS related tasks were observed using video review compared to live observations. In absolute terms, a mean of 2.9 (during simulated resuscitations) respectively 2.5 (during actual resuscitations) ATLS-related tasks per resuscitation were not identified using live observers, that were observed through video analysis. The interobserver variability for observed ATLS related tasks was significantly higher using video analysis compared to live observations for both simulated (video analysis: ICC 0.97; 95% CI 0.97–0.98 vs. live observation: ICC 0.69; 95% CI 0.57–0.78) and real-life witnessed resuscitations (video analyse 0.99; 95% CI 0.99–1.00 vs live observers 0.86; 95% CI 0.83–0.89).
Conclusion
Video analysis of trauma resuscitations may be more valid and reliable compared to evaluation by live observers. These outcomes may guide the debate to justify video review instead of live observations.
“…[24] Interestingly, only 2.8% of trauma centers had first-hand experience with a video analysisrelated medical-legal problem. Moreso, video review may even reduce medicolegal cases, as Yang et al [29] found a significant relation between patient safety and the risk of medicolegal involvement of physician in Canadian hospitals. In other words, video review may enhance patient safety, which may result in less medicolegal issues of physicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there are some recently described advanced methods available that could significantly ano[nymize] patients and personnel in the trauma room. In the study by Silas et al (29) videos of operating rooms during surgery were processed into point clouds. Recognition of staff by their colleagues was rated using a Likert scale, where the score of 1 was anonymous, (unable to identify) and a score of 10 was not anonymous, (easy to identify) The mean scores for unaltered and point cloud videos were 7.05 and 1.41, respectively (p < 0.001).…”
Introduction
A trauma resuscitation is dynamic and complex process in which failures could lead to serious adverse events. In several trauma centers, evaluation of trauma resuscitation is part of a hospital’s quality assessment program. While video analysis is commonly used, some hospitals use live observations, mainly due to ethical and medicolegal concerns. The aim of this study was to compare the validity and reliability of video analysis and live observations to evaluate trauma resuscitations.
Methods
In this prospective observational study, validity was assessed by comparing the observed adherence to 28 advanced trauma life support (ATLS) guideline related tasks by video analysis to life observations. Interobserver reliability was assessed by calculating the intra class coefficient of observed ATLS related tasks by live observations and video analysis.
Results
Eleven simulated and thirteen real-life resuscitations were assessed. Overall, the percentage of observed ATLS related tasks performed during simulated resuscitations was 10.4% (P < 0.001) higher when the same resuscitations were analysed using video compared to live observations. During real-life resuscitations, 8.7% (p < 0.001) more ATLS related tasks were observed using video review compared to live observations. In absolute terms, a mean of 2.9 (during simulated resuscitations) respectively 2.5 (during actual resuscitations) ATLS-related tasks per resuscitation were not identified using live observers, that were observed through video analysis. The interobserver variability for observed ATLS related tasks was significantly higher using video analysis compared to live observations for both simulated (video analysis: ICC 0.97; 95% CI 0.97–0.98 vs. live observation: ICC 0.69; 95% CI 0.57–0.78) and real-life witnessed resuscitations (video analyse 0.99; 95% CI 0.99–1.00 vs live observers 0.86; 95% CI 0.83–0.89).
Conclusion
Video analysis of trauma resuscitations may be more valid and reliable compared to evaluation by live observers. These outcomes may guide the debate to justify video review instead of live observations.
“…The best way to control costs, however, is to improve safety so that both patient harm and subsequent litigation are reduced. Improving safety in health systems overall is likely to reduce the level of avoidable harm and thus decrease litigation111213: the recently published NHS patient safety strategy suggested potential to reduce claims provision by around £750m a year by 2025, for example. The Public Accounts Committee’s 2017 report accordingly recommended that urgent and coordinated action be taken to reduce patient harm, especially in maternity care 4.…”
Spending on clinical negligence is escalating, constituting a major threat to the sustainability of the NHS In England, payments for negligence awards are resourced from the same funds used to provide care Improvements in quality and patient safety might help to reduce litigation costs but need to be evidence based Solving the crisis in litigation costs will require a system-wide effort, with engagement and coordination of stakeholders across the health system
“…Canadian data support the merits of transition, with evidence demonstrating a reduction of patient safety incidents is associated with reduced physician medicolegal risk. 31 From a physician medicolegal risk management perspective, engagement in programme QI initiatives seems to be a powerful tool against medicolegal liability. Particular to VAR programmes, physicians may perceive increased vulnerability to litigation and patient complaints.…”
Section: Professional Risk Physician Perspectivementioning
While video and audio recording (VAR) of patients is well described for clinical research, its application to quality improvement in the emergency department has thus far been limited and hindered by potential obstacles. We believe this technology holds promise to incite marked systems improvement but only if deployed in a thoughtful and principled manner. Experts in clinical, regulatory, legal, quality improvement, patient safety and ethical domains collaborated to articulate the salient considerations and challenges to implementation of a VAR programme. We describe this implementation using the lens of legislation and other principles specific to our current context. The landscape of ethical, legal and regulatory barriers and a case example of how a VAR programme has been implemented in an emergency department in Ontario, Canada are outlined. The potential to harness VAR data to drive quality and to improve safety is remarkable. Articulating the most contentious issues and illustrating how they can be addressed may guide others hoping to implement similar VAR programmes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.