2016
DOI: 10.1002/lary.26057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved facial nerve identification during parotidectomy with fluorescently labeled peptide

Abstract: Objectives/Hypothesis Additional intraoperative guidance could reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury during parotid gland cancer surgery. We evaluated the intraoperative use of fluorescently labeled nerve binding peptide NP41 to aid facial nerve identification and preservation during parotidectomy in an orthotopic model of murine parotid gland cancer. We also quantified the accuracy of intraoperative nerve detection for surface and buried nerves in the head and neck with NP41 versus white light (WL) alone. St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8285 In 1 preclinical study, facial nerve imaging in murine models with the fluorescently labeled peptide NP41 demonstrated increased nerve to surrounding tissue contrast by a factor of 2.86 ( P = 0.005). 86 FI significantly improved detection of additional nerve branches, particularly those underlying surrounding tissue (7.50 ± 1.60 small nerve branches vs 3.25 ± 0.89 with white light). 86 Although nerve imaging has not yet translated into clinical trials, these data suggest that concurrent nerve imaging, when combined with current imaging and monitoring techniques, can improve the functional outcomes and QOL in patients by improving nerve preservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8285 In 1 preclinical study, facial nerve imaging in murine models with the fluorescently labeled peptide NP41 demonstrated increased nerve to surrounding tissue contrast by a factor of 2.86 ( P = 0.005). 86 FI significantly improved detection of additional nerve branches, particularly those underlying surrounding tissue (7.50 ± 1.60 small nerve branches vs 3.25 ± 0.89 with white light). 86 Although nerve imaging has not yet translated into clinical trials, these data suggest that concurrent nerve imaging, when combined with current imaging and monitoring techniques, can improve the functional outcomes and QOL in patients by improving nerve preservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…86 FI significantly improved detection of additional nerve branches, particularly those underlying surrounding tissue (7.50 ± 1.60 small nerve branches vs 3.25 ± 0.89 with white light). 86 Although nerve imaging has not yet translated into clinical trials, these data suggest that concurrent nerve imaging, when combined with current imaging and monitoring techniques, can improve the functional outcomes and QOL in patients by improving nerve preservation. With emerging preclinical studies, there is, however, evidence to suggest that future intraoperative imaging will expand to include visualization of extratumoral structures and tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recent developments in intraoperative nerve visualization can be found in new uses of ultrasonography, fluorescent markers and optical coherence tomography (OCT) [15][16][17][18][19]. However, these methods have their drawbacks; blunt dissection of nerves is not without risk, due to the risk of traction-stretch neuropathy [10,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oncologic surgery, in particular, poses a risk of nerve injury as anatomy is often distorted by the disease [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Tools for pre and perioperative nerve enhancement exist [18][19][20] and fluorescent nerve imaging agents, as well as multimodal optical imaging techniques, are raising interest for intraoperative applications [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%