2005
DOI: 10.1021/jp052436c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Density Functionals for Water

Abstract: The accuracy of existing density functional methods for describing the noncovalent interaction energies in small water clusters is investigated by testing 25 density functionals against a data set of 28 water dimers and 8 water trimers whose structures are taken from the literature and from simulations. The most accurate functionals are found to be PW6B95 with a mean unsigned error of 0.13 kcal/mol and MPWB1K and B98 with mean unsigned errors of 0.15 kcal/mol; the best functional with no Hartree-Fock exchange … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
141
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(78 reference statements)
3
141
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous work 50 we have tested the ability of the pairwise additive approximation to reproduce full density functional calculations of binding energies of small water clusters ranging in size from trimer to pentamer. The database used in that work consists of a set of eight trimers, six tetramers, and a pentamer; the structures are taken from Monte Carlo and molecular mechanics simulations of bulk water and ice, as well as from gas-phase optimizations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous work 50 we have tested the ability of the pairwise additive approximation to reproduce full density functional calculations of binding energies of small water clusters ranging in size from trimer to pentamer. The database used in that work consists of a set of eight trimers, six tetramers, and a pentamer; the structures are taken from Monte Carlo and molecular mechanics simulations of bulk water and ice, as well as from gas-phase optimizations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, while the pairwise additive approximation may give qualitatively correct results it does not give good quantative results, even for small clusters with highly accurate pair potentials. 50 While the inclusion of the three-body terms helps to improve quantitative accuracy, 51 the results may still be insufficiently accurate for systems in which many-body effects play an important role, such as water clusters. 52 As a result of these shortcomings, some workers have tried to modify the pairwise and three-body approximations by adding additional terms to the monomer, dimer, or trimer Hamiltonian that account for the electrostatic field of the other atoms in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type and hierarchy of the interactions (electrostatic, inductive, hydrogen bonding, and dispersive interactions) responsible for driving OH − to the interface are not fully resolved by current density functionals (7,44,(49)(50)(51)(52). balance each other on the aerial side of water, the point of zero charge, is pH PZC ∼3.…”
Section: Quantum-mechanical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the PBE value for H 2 O dimer interactions is about 0.02 eV higher than the benchmark number from high level quantum chemistry calculations. 38 It should be noted that the DFT-PBE error could be as high as 0.05 eV for highly nonlinear H bonds. 39 However, DFT at the generalized gradient approximation ͑GGA͒ level is not suitable for dispersion interactions, which may play a more important role for larger complex structures.…”
Section: Experimental and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%