2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra01033d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved cycling stability of lithium–sulphur batteries by enhancing the retention of active material with a sandwiched hydrothermally treated graphite film

Abstract: Dou, S. (2016). Improved cycling stability of lithium-sulphur batteries by enhancing the retention of active material with a sandwiched hydrothermally treated graphite film. RSC Advances, 6 (41), 34131-34136. Improved cycling stability of lithium-sulphur batteries by enhancing the retention of active material with a sandwiched hydrothermally treated graphite film AbstractA new lithium-sulphur battery with a hydrothermally treated graphite film sandwiched between the separator and the sulphur cathode shows i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the high theoretical specific capacity (1675 mAh g −1 ) and high theoretical energy density (2600 Wh kg −1 ) of lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries based on the two‐electron reaction from S to Li 2 S, Li‐S batteries have drawn considerable attentions and been considered as the promising energy‐storage systems . In addition, sulfur is abundant, low‐cost, and environmentally friendly . Unfortunately, the development of Li‐S batteries is still obstructed by several issues that must be addressed; for instance, the extremely poor electronic conductivity of sulfur and the discharge final products (Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S), the large volumetric expansion of sulfur particles, the high dissolution of long‐chain polysulfide intermediates in organic electrolyte, and the unwanted shuttle effect during the charge–discharge process .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the high theoretical specific capacity (1675 mAh g −1 ) and high theoretical energy density (2600 Wh kg −1 ) of lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries based on the two‐electron reaction from S to Li 2 S, Li‐S batteries have drawn considerable attentions and been considered as the promising energy‐storage systems . In addition, sulfur is abundant, low‐cost, and environmentally friendly . Unfortunately, the development of Li‐S batteries is still obstructed by several issues that must be addressed; for instance, the extremely poor electronic conductivity of sulfur and the discharge final products (Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S), the large volumetric expansion of sulfur particles, the high dissolution of long‐chain polysulfide intermediates in organic electrolyte, and the unwanted shuttle effect during the charge–discharge process .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,10] Nevertheless, there are obstacles that should be overcome for the development of Li-S batteries, including the insulating nature of sulfur (5 × 10 −30 S cm −1 ), the large volume change of sulfur (≈80%), and the poor cycle performance by the shuttle phenomenon. [31,32] Among them, conductive carbon materials such as carbon fiber, [33][34][35][36][37] porous carbon, [38][39][40][41][42] graphite, [43][44][45] graphene Developing a highly effective interlayer inserted between the sulfur electrode and separator is one of the most important issues in Li-S battery research, because this interlayer enhances the cycle performance of the Li-S battery by trapping the lithium polysulfides in the sulfur electrode. These lithium polysulfides diffuse to the Li metal anode, leading to a loss of sulfur from the sulfur electrode and low coulombic efficiency (CE).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon nanotubes can block the dissolution of iodine species, and enhance the rate performance of iodine cathode. 22,23 Therefore, the assembled novel Li-I 2 batteries in this work can show excellent rate performance with much longer cycle life (up to 5000cycles, >99.5% capacity retention), compared to aqueous Li-I 2 batteries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%