Abstract:The existence of various land surfaces always leads to more difficulties in cloud detection based on satellite observations, especially over bright surfaces such as snow and deserts. To improve the cloud mask result over complex terrain, an unbiased, daytime cloud detection algorithm for the Visible and InfRared Radiometer (VIRR) on board the Chinese FengYun-3A polar-orbiting meteorological satellite is applied over the northwest region of China. The algorithm refers to the concept of the clear confidence leve… Show more
“…7): (i) the enhancement of ice clouds could be seen in the tropics due to the Hadley cell at about 88; (ii) the low ice cloud coverage was identified in the subtropical high pressure belt at about 2208 and 238; and (iii) the enhancement of both ice and water clouds was indicated at higher latitudes (about 608) in the known storm-track regions of both hemispheres. Where MODIS water coverage was lower than CTYPE-lidar, it was likely due to the passive MODIS sensors having difficulty observing clouds, especially at high latitudes over bright surfaces such as snow (Wang et al 2013), as can be seen in Fig. The MODIS ice cloud coverage was much lower than CTYPE-lidar, and this reflected the difference in the cloud detection sensitivity between CALIOP and MODIS.…”
Section: A Cloud Coverage Comparison With Vfm and Modismentioning
This study analyzed the global and seasonal characteristics of cloud phase and ice crystal orientation (CTYPE-lidar) by using the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) on board the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO). A dataset from September 2006 to August 2007 was used to derive the seasonal characteristics. The discrimination scheme was originally developed by Yoshida et al., who classified clouds mainly into warm water, supercooled water, and randomly oriented ice crystals or horizontally oriented ice plates. This study used the following products for the comparison with CTYPE-lidar: (i) the vertical feature mask (VFM) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), (ii) the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and (iii) European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Overall, the results showed that the CTYPE-lidar discrimination scheme was consistent with the outputs from VFM, MODIS, and ECMWF. The zonal mean water cloud cover in daytime from this study showed good agreement with that derived from MODIS; the slope of the linear regression was 1.06 and the offset was 0.002. The CTYPE-lidar ice cloud occurrence frequency and the ECMWF ice supersaturation occurrence frequency were also in good agreement; the slope of the linear regression of the two products was 1.02 in the temperature range 2608C # T # 2308C. The maximum occurrence frequencies in this study and ECMWF were recognized around 2608C of the equator, with their peak shifted from several degrees north (;98N) in September-November (SON) to south (;98S) in December-February (DJF) and back to north (;78N) in March-May (MAM) and June-August (JJA).
“…7): (i) the enhancement of ice clouds could be seen in the tropics due to the Hadley cell at about 88; (ii) the low ice cloud coverage was identified in the subtropical high pressure belt at about 2208 and 238; and (iii) the enhancement of both ice and water clouds was indicated at higher latitudes (about 608) in the known storm-track regions of both hemispheres. Where MODIS water coverage was lower than CTYPE-lidar, it was likely due to the passive MODIS sensors having difficulty observing clouds, especially at high latitudes over bright surfaces such as snow (Wang et al 2013), as can be seen in Fig. The MODIS ice cloud coverage was much lower than CTYPE-lidar, and this reflected the difference in the cloud detection sensitivity between CALIOP and MODIS.…”
Section: A Cloud Coverage Comparison With Vfm and Modismentioning
This study analyzed the global and seasonal characteristics of cloud phase and ice crystal orientation (CTYPE-lidar) by using the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) on board the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO). A dataset from September 2006 to August 2007 was used to derive the seasonal characteristics. The discrimination scheme was originally developed by Yoshida et al., who classified clouds mainly into warm water, supercooled water, and randomly oriented ice crystals or horizontally oriented ice plates. This study used the following products for the comparison with CTYPE-lidar: (i) the vertical feature mask (VFM) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), (ii) the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and (iii) European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Overall, the results showed that the CTYPE-lidar discrimination scheme was consistent with the outputs from VFM, MODIS, and ECMWF. The zonal mean water cloud cover in daytime from this study showed good agreement with that derived from MODIS; the slope of the linear regression was 1.06 and the offset was 0.002. The CTYPE-lidar ice cloud occurrence frequency and the ECMWF ice supersaturation occurrence frequency were also in good agreement; the slope of the linear regression of the two products was 1.02 in the temperature range 2608C # T # 2308C. The maximum occurrence frequencies in this study and ECMWF were recognized around 2608C of the equator, with their peak shifted from several degrees north (;98N) in September-November (SON) to south (;98S) in December-February (DJF) and back to north (;78N) in March-May (MAM) and June-August (JJA).
“…Single band reflectance tests: Single band reflectance tests for discriminating clouds from clear-sky areas have been well studied (Ackerman et al, 1998;Hutchison et al, 2005;Frey et al, 2008;He, 2011;Nakajima et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2012). In the non-absorption visible and near-infrared bands, the reflectance of clouds typically shows a higher value than that of clear-sky surfaces.…”
Section: Threshold Tests For Capimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which has 36 channels that cover wavelengths from the visible to thermal infrared regions, allows for a more precise cloud-screening result. Thus, MODIS data are commonly used to evaluate cloud-screening results of other sensors Wang et al, 2012). To investigate the cloud-screening ability of GOSAT/TANSO-CAI, an inter-satellite comparison with Aqua/MODIS, which uses the same algorithm (CLAUDIA), has been performed by Ishida et al (2011).…”
Cloud detection is an essential preprocessing step for retrieving carbon dioxide from satellite observations of reflected sunlight. During the pre-launch study of the Chinese Carbon Dioxide Observation Satellite (TANSAT), a cloud-screening scheme was presented for the Cloud and Aerosol Polarization Imager (CAPI), which only performs measurements in five channels located in the visible to near-infrared regions of the spectrum. The scheme for CAPI, based on previous cloudscreening algorithms, defines a method to regroup individual threshold tests for each pixel in a scene according to the derived clear confidence level. This scheme is proven to be more effective for sensors with few channels. The work relies upon the radiance data from the Visible and Infrared Radiometer (VIRR) onboard the Chinese FengYun-3A Polar-orbiting Meteorological Satellite (FY-3A), which uses four wavebands similar to that of CAPI and can serve as a proxy for its measurements. The scheme has been applied to a number of the VIRR scenes over four target areas (desert, snow, ocean, forest) for all seasons. To assess the screening results, comparisons against the cloud-screening product from MODIS are made. The evaluation suggests that the proposed scheme inherits the advantages of schemes described in previous publications and shows improved cloud-screening results. A seasonal analysis reveals that this scheme provides better performance during warmer seasons, except for observations over oceans, where results are much better in colder seasons.
“…To eliminate residual clouds from the retrieved AOD fields, a cloud post-processing method has been developed to recognise and discard undetected clouds in AOD retrieved from the AATSR radiances with the ATSR dualview (ADV) algorithm for aerosol retrieval over land and the ATSR single-view (ASV) aerosol retrieval algorithm for application over ocean (Kolmonen et al, 2016). The ATSR has been designed to measure sea surface temperature and, therefore, the cloud detection scheme designed for use with this instrument has been optimised for application over open ocean and does not perform well over land (Závody et al, 2000;Birks, 2007a). Therefore, an improved cloud detection scheme has been developed for application to ADV/ASV (Roblez González, 2003;Kolmonen et al, 2016), but the retrieved AOD is still affected by residual cloud contamination.…”
Cloud misclassification is a serious problem in the retrieval of aerosol optical depth (AOD), which might considerably bias the AOD results. On the one hand, residual cloud contamination leads to AOD overestimation, whereas the removal of high-AOD pixels (due to their misclassification as clouds) leads to underestimation. To remove cloudcontaminated areas in AOD retrieved from reflectances measured with the (Advanced) Along Track Scanning Radiometers (ATSR-2 and AATSR), using the ATSR dual-view algorithm (ADV) over land or the ATSR single-view algorithm (ASV) over ocean, a cloud post-processing (CPP) scheme has been developed at the Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) as described in Kolmonen et al. (2016). The application of this scheme results in the removal of cloudcontaminated areas, providing spatially smoother AOD maps and favourable comparison with AOD obtained from the ground-based reference measurements from the AERONET sun photometer network. However, closer inspection shows that the CPP also removes areas with elevated AOD not due to cloud contamination, as shown in this paper. We present an improved CPP scheme which better discriminates between cloud-free and cloud-contaminated areas. The CPP thresholds have been further evaluated and adjusted according to the findings. The thresholds for the detection of high-AOD regions (> 60 % of the retrieved pixels should be high-AOD (> 0.6) pixels), and cloud contamination criteria for low-AOD regions have been accepted as the default for AOD global post-processing in the improved CPP. Retaining elevated AOD while effectively removing cloud-contaminated pixels affects the resulting global and regional mean AOD values as well as coverage. Effects of the CPP scheme on both spatial and temporal variation for the period 2002-2012 are discussed. With the improved CPP, the AOD coverage increases by 10-15 % with respect to the existing scheme. The validation versus AERONET shows an improvement of the correlation coefficient from 0.84 to 0.86 for the global data set for the period 2002-2012. The global aggregated AOD over land for the period 2003-2011 is 0.163 with the improved CPP compared to 0.144 with the existing scheme. The aggregated AOD over ocean and globally (land and ocean together) is 0.164 with the improved CPP scheme (compared to 0.152 and 0.150 with the existing scheme, for ocean and globally respectively). Effects of the improved CPP scheme on the 10-year time series are illustrated and seasonal and temporal changes are discussed. The improved CPP method introduced here is applicable to other aerosol retrieval algorithms. However, the thresholds for detecting the high-AOD regions, which were developed for AATSR, might have to be adjusted to the actual features of the instruments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.