2014
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved clinical outcomes and survival following repair of acute type A aortic dissection in the current era

Abstract: Surgical era significantly impacts early outcomes and actuarial survival following repair of acute type A aortic dissection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
20
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not quite true. The results of surgery of acute dissection have dramatically improved in the last 2 decades and many centres presently report on large experiences with a hospital mortality of <10% [3][4][5]. Therefore, the discrepancy between the results obtained by the two groups of surgeons in the present study (4 vs 21% hospital mortality) is rather intriguing, especially when considering that each 'non-aortic' surgeon has an experience of more than 2000 cases of cardiac surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This is not quite true. The results of surgery of acute dissection have dramatically improved in the last 2 decades and many centres presently report on large experiences with a hospital mortality of <10% [3][4][5]. Therefore, the discrepancy between the results obtained by the two groups of surgeons in the present study (4 vs 21% hospital mortality) is rather intriguing, especially when considering that each 'non-aortic' surgeon has an experience of more than 2000 cases of cardiac surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The majority of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) requiring surgical intervention are in their 60s and 70s . However, AAAD repair is sometimes necessary in younger patients .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) requiring surgical intervention are in their 60s and 70s. [1][2][3] However, AAAD repair is sometimes necessary in younger patients. [4][5][6] These patients are more likely than older patients to have a genetic component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the contemporary era, there is growing consensus that the distal anastomosis should be performed using the opendistal technique because of a better visualization of the dissected aorta, proper exclusion of the false lumen, and possibility of inspecting and identifying intimal tears in the arch. 4 Moreover, the natural history of aortic dissection teaches us that in most cases there is a distal progression of the aortic disease that often requires further surgical or endovascular treatments. Considering this, increasing the extent of aortic replacement during the first operation, such as performing a total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique, may improve the outcomes, reducing the probability of a second surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%