2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.973959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved classification performance of EEG-fNIRS multimodal brain-computer interface based on multi-domain features and multi-level progressive learning

Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) have potentially complementary characteristics that reflect the electrical and hemodynamic characteristics of neural responses, so EEG-fNIRS-based hybrid brain-computer interface (BCI) is the research hotspots in recent years. However, current studies lack a comprehensive systematic approach to properly fuse EEG and fNIRS data and exploit their complementary potential, which is critical for improving BCI performance. To address this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by the above studies, in order to break through the limitations of single domain EEG features to varying degrees, provide more comprehensive and detailed EEG analysis, and to simultaneously reduce the impact of small sample sizes of MI-EEG samples from individual subjects and inter-individual differences across subjects on MI task classification models, this paper proposes an EEG joint feature classification algorithm based on instance transfer and ensemble learning. The algorithm includes three stages: the first stage is preprocessing of source and target domain data; the second stage is to use the CSP algorithm and Power Spectral Density (PSD) to extract spatial and frequency domain features, respectively, and to combine the two features as EEG joint features, so as to fully explore EEG and enrich EEG features, and improve MI identification performance (Bin et al, 2019;Qiu et al, 2022); The third stage is to classify MI-EEG using an ensemble learning algorithm based on kernel mean matching (KMM) (Xing et al, 2007) and adaptive enhancement of transfer learning (TrAdaBoost) (Dai et al, 2007). Firstly, the KMM algorithm is used to adjust the sample weights to make the feature distribution of the source domain closer to that of the target domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the above studies, in order to break through the limitations of single domain EEG features to varying degrees, provide more comprehensive and detailed EEG analysis, and to simultaneously reduce the impact of small sample sizes of MI-EEG samples from individual subjects and inter-individual differences across subjects on MI task classification models, this paper proposes an EEG joint feature classification algorithm based on instance transfer and ensemble learning. The algorithm includes three stages: the first stage is preprocessing of source and target domain data; the second stage is to use the CSP algorithm and Power Spectral Density (PSD) to extract spatial and frequency domain features, respectively, and to combine the two features as EEG joint features, so as to fully explore EEG and enrich EEG features, and improve MI identification performance (Bin et al, 2019;Qiu et al, 2022); The third stage is to classify MI-EEG using an ensemble learning algorithm based on kernel mean matching (KMM) (Xing et al, 2007) and adaptive enhancement of transfer learning (TrAdaBoost) (Dai et al, 2007). Firstly, the KMM algorithm is used to adjust the sample weights to make the feature distribution of the source domain closer to that of the target domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%