2001
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/34/10/313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved binding energies for LiPs, e+Be, NaPs and e+Mg

Abstract: The stochastic variational method and its fixed core variant are applied to the calculation of lithium positride (LiPs), positronic beryllium (e + Be), sodium positride (NaPs) and positronic magnesium (e + Mg). The revised binding energy of LiPs was 0.012 341 Hartree, that for e + Be was 0.031 47 Hartree, that for NaPs was 0.008 419 Hartree and the binding energy for e + Mg was 0.015 612 Hartree. The binding energies for LiPs and e + Be are expected to be within 2% of the variational limit. The uncertainties i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
60
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(71 reference statements)
7
60
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Such small changes show that the 12s basis is already almost complete. Comparing our 19s binding energy with the stochastic-variational calculation of Mitroy and Ryzhikh [66], which was used as the reference in determining the values of ρ A [43], we see that we have agreement at the level of 0.6%. This very small discrepancy can be ascribed to a slightly different description of the electrostatic field of the Be atom and possibly also due to our basis set not being totally complete.…”
Section: A Atoms: Be Mg He and Armentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Such small changes show that the 12s basis is already almost complete. Comparing our 19s binding energy with the stochastic-variational calculation of Mitroy and Ryzhikh [66], which was used as the reference in determining the values of ρ A [43], we see that we have agreement at the level of 0.6%. This very small discrepancy can be ascribed to a slightly different description of the electrostatic field of the Be atom and possibly also due to our basis set not being totally complete.…”
Section: A Atoms: Be Mg He and Armentioning
confidence: 54%
“…They give an electron affinity of 0.0238(4) hartree, a positron affinity (PA) of 0.2294(4) hartree, and a Ps binding energy (BE) of 0.0032(4) hartree. While the electron affinity turns out to be in fair agreement with the experimental value, namely 0.023 hartree [34], both PA and BE are roughly 0.009 hartree smaller than the best estimate [4]. These discrepancies might be due to the absence of polarization effects of the core electrons due to the two active electrons and the positron, and to a relatively inaccurate representation of the 1s 2 electron density by means of a single STO-1s function.…”
Section: The E + Lih Systemmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The van der Waals force is therefore an order of magnitude stronger for Ps interacting with Li. Our approximation gives a PsLi bound state with binding energy 0.224 eV, somewhat less than 0.336 eV, the most accurate calculated value [28]. Figure 8 shows our calculated total cross section and its components.…”
Section: Positronium Scattering By Lithium ( Ps(1s)-li(2s))mentioning
confidence: 76%