2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2004.03.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positronium–atom collisions

Abstract: New results are presented for Ps(1s) scattering by H(1s), He(1 1 S) and Li(2s). Calculations have been performed in a coupled state framework, usually employing pseudostates, and allowing for excitation of both the Ps and the atom. In the Ps(1s)-H(1s) calculations the H − formation channel has also been included using a highly accurate H − wave function. Resonances resulting from unstable states in which the positron orbits H − have been calculated and analysed. The new Ps(1s)-He(1 1 S) calculations still fail… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

18
74
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
18
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] Improvements in this theory have still not resolved the disagreements. [10] Above 10 eV there are Ps beam measurements of the total cross section which are in reasonable accord with all three theories but which, at 10 eV, show a tantalizing turn-down towards the Michigan measurements. [11] Unfortunately the beam experiments find difficulty penetrating into the region below 10 eV.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…[3] Improvements in this theory have still not resolved the disagreements. [10] Above 10 eV there are Ps beam measurements of the total cross section which are in reasonable accord with all three theories but which, at 10 eV, show a tantalizing turn-down towards the Michigan measurements. [11] Unfortunately the beam experiments find difficulty penetrating into the region below 10 eV.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…www.pss-c.com Figure 6(b) shows the momentum transfer cross section for He both in the frozen target approximation (Fig. 4) and in an approximation allowing for target excitation [29]. Allowing for target excitation does move the cross section towards the experiments of Canter et al, Rytsölä et al and Skalsey et al but there is still substantial disagreement.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…(a) Ps(1s)+H(1s) total cross section [28]. (b) Ps(1s)+He(1 1 S) momentum transfer cross section [29]; experiment: square, Nagashima et al [20]; up triangle, Canter et al [18]; down triangle, Rytsölä et al [30]; circle, Skalsey et al [31]. Figure 5(a) compares frozen target calculations [16,17] with beam measurements of the total cross section for He [23][24][25] at impact energies of 10 eV and above.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations