Imposing Democracy to Ensure the Peace: The Role of Coercive Socialization

Paul, Fritz

doi:10.1111/fpa.12042

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This suggests that trying to impose Western values, which the U.S. has claimed it is doing, is actually detrimental to the development of Middle Eastern states. Fritz (2015) argues that imposing democracy on states has a very limited chance of success and economic and political stability must instead be attained through a process of modernization. Although Frank (1970) Promoting democracy or pursuing hegemony?…”

Section: Constructivist Contrastmentioning

confidence: 99%

Promoting democracy or pursuing hegemony? An analysis of U.S. involvement in the Middle East

Wood¹

2019

Journal of Global Faultlines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Promoting democracy in the Middle East has been cited by the U.S. as a key foreign policy objective post-Cold War. As a result the U.S. has intervened in numerous countries and conflicts, particularly since 9/11 and the subsequent declaration of the War on Terror. However, this has not been without controversy and its actions often aid imperialism rather than the country it claims its intervention is benefitting. This paper challenges the claim that the U.S. is indeed promoting democracy, arguing that it is instead pursuing national objectives to increase hegemony. By analyzing U.S. involvement in the Middle East from the Soviet-Afghan War, through the Invasion of Iraq and Arab Spring, up to present day, this paper contends that the U.S. has continuously created instability in the region, in terms of both state and human security. By constructing various actors as threats to themselves, the West or the world, the U.S. has been able to justify its aggressive pursuit of foreign policy objectives in the Middle East. Utilizing the theories of realism, liberalism, and constructivism, this research discusses how the U.S. has attempted to achieve hegemony in the region, and indeed globally, before contrasting this with humanitarian efforts it has been a part of. The paper also analyses the impact external actors have had on U.S. action, discussing the crucial but often constrained role of the United Nations, as well as the contentious proliferation of private military and security companies in the post-Cold War era.

show abstract

Section: Constructivist Contrastmentioning

confidence: 99%