2004
DOI: 10.1080/0269745042000323201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importing a policy problem? Affordable housing in Britain's National Parks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with other countries such as the USA and New Zealand where National Parks are nationally owned and are managed mainly for ecosystem protection and recreation, with minimal or no resource exploitation or habitation (Richards 2004). The diverse land uses of National Parks in Britain create a challenge for National Park authorities who have to balance a range of responsibilities:…”
Section: National Parks In the Britainmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This contrasts with other countries such as the USA and New Zealand where National Parks are nationally owned and are managed mainly for ecosystem protection and recreation, with minimal or no resource exploitation or habitation (Richards 2004). The diverse land uses of National Parks in Britain create a challenge for National Park authorities who have to balance a range of responsibilities:…”
Section: National Parks In the Britainmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The lack of rural affordable housing also leads to issues of social justice and inequality as 'local people' are unable to afford homes as a result of the demand from more wealthy 'outsiders' (Richards 2004). This has led to tension in some rural areas with attacks on holiday homes and businesses (Bathurst 2007;Morris 2007).…”
Section: Sustainable Rural Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations