2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab5ffd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of the substrate’s surface evolution during the MOVPE growth of 2D-transition metal dichalcogenides

Abstract: In this paper, we explore the impact of changing the growth conditions on the substrate surface during the metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy of 2D-transition metal dichalcogenides. We particularly study the growth of molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) on sapphire substrates at different temperatures. We show that a high temperature leads to a perfect epitaxial alignment of the MoS 2 layer with respect to the sapphire substrate underneath, whereas a low temperature growth induces a 30°epitaxial alignment. This behav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The secondary domains are formed as a result of uncontrolled defect sites in the first MoS2 layer which acts as nucleation sites. 32 From the AFM images an overall increase in the surface coverage of features with an increase in the concentration of 4-NBD is also observed for CVD-MoS2. We also compared AFM images of 4-NP functionalized bulk and CVD-MoS2, and similar features were observed on both bulk and CVD-MoS2 as shown in figure SI 4.…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The secondary domains are formed as a result of uncontrolled defect sites in the first MoS2 layer which acts as nucleation sites. 32 From the AFM images an overall increase in the surface coverage of features with an increase in the concentration of 4-NBD is also observed for CVD-MoS2. We also compared AFM images of 4-NP functionalized bulk and CVD-MoS2, and similar features were observed on both bulk and CVD-MoS2 as shown in figure SI 4.…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (MX 2 , with M being a transition metal and X a chalcogen) attract lots of attention for next-generation electronics, optoelectronics, and photonics. Their advanced properties predominantly excel in monolayer and few-layer form which fuels research on the large-area deposition of atomically thin MX 2 material. A variety of thin film deposition techniques have been explored, ranging from powder vapor transport (PVT, often termed chemical vapor transport, CVT), ,, molecular beam epitaxy, , and chalcogenidation of predeposited films, to atomic layer deposition and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). The PVT method has been widely adopted to grow MX 2 layers with millimeter or even centimeter grain size on both amorphous and crystalline substrates . Yet, it remains challenging to deliver a constant precursor supply uniformly across the reactor zone, which eventually hampers control over MX 2 layer thickness and layer properties across large-area substrates and renders PVT not compatible with high-volume manufacturing. , On the other hand, in CVD, gas-phase precursors are delivered to the reaction chamber through dedicated precursor delivery systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a similar epitaxial relationship as previously reported for the growths of WSe 2 /MoS 2 on various reconstructed sapphire surfaces. [ 21,23,37 ] The identical (01¯) and (01) diffraction streaks observed from the diffraction patterns uncover an important limitation of the quasi‐vdW epitaxy experiment. In Figure 2b, the RHEED pattern in the WSe 2 ⟨⟩11true2¯0 direction is presented where several intensity line profiles are extracted from various “ k z ” positions that give information about the out‐of‐plane ordering of the grown 2D crystal planes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] Therefore, the quasi‐vdW and vdW epitaxy (2D‐on‐3D and 2D‐on‐2D, respectively) of layered chalcogenides is extensively being researched in the literature. [ 15–20 ] One of the major concerns in (quasi‐)vdW epitaxy of these materials is the systematic formation of stacking faults like 60° twins, as observed in either molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) (quasi‐vdW [ 21–29 ] and vdW [ 21,30–36 ] ), metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy (quasi‐vdW [ 21,37–42 ] and vdW [ 21,43,44 ] ), and chemical vapor epitaxy (quasi‐vdW [ 45–47 ] and vdW [ 48–53 ] ). To mitigate the formation of these defects, several approaches are being reported that rely on optimized growth conditions, [ 54–56 ] buffer layer growth, [ 57 ] growth on h‐BN templates, [ 54,58 ] or the introduction of a 3D aspect in the growth surface like surface roughness [ 59 ] or surface step edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%