Importance of the Protection of Privacy of Juvenile Suspects or Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings in the Context of the Eu Law

Abstract

The protection of privacy of juvenile suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings is one of the fundamental principles of juvenile criminal procedure. The aim of this right is to prevent any unnecessary stigmatisation and labelling of juveniles suspected/accused as perpetrators (of criminal act) by their peers or others in their community. The involvement in a formal criminal proceeding can be very stressful for a juvenile and affect their further development and mental health. The protection of privacy during criminal proceeding helps them in their rehabilitation and reintegration into society after conviction. Countries usually protect the juveniles` right to privacy by closing the criminal proceeding for general public and by restricting the disclosure of information about criminal proceedings involving juveniles as suspects or accused persons to the media. In practice, this means that a limited number of people in criminal justice system has the right to access information about suspected/accused juveniles. Unfortunately, the present-day media often neglect this right and use information about juveniles in criminal proceeding in their news reports in a sensationalist way in order to increase their circulation. That kind of practice shows that this right is considered irrelevant and that the media and general public do not have appropriate knowledge about the importance and reasons why this right has been incorporated into the juvenile criminal procedure. This paper analyses the importance of the protection of privacy of juveniles who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceeding according to the international documents, ECHR, the relevant case law and the Directive EU 800/2016 with reference to the legislative solutions found in some EU Member States including Croatia.

Maloljetničko kazneno pravo - Quid accidit ? problemi u primjeni pojedinih prava iz direktive 2016/800/EU u praksi

“…državi članici izvršenja. 18 Odredbe Direktive primjenjuju se na kazneni postupak, postupak izvršenja europskog uhidbenog naloga te uvijek u slučaju kada je maloljetnik lišen slobode, neovisno o kojoj se fazi kaznenog postupka radi. 19 U kaznenom postupku odredbe Direktive primjenjuju se od trenutka kada je maloljetnik postao osumnjičenik, odnosno okrivljenik u kaznenom postupku pa sve do pravomoćnog okončanja postupka, s tim da se ne primjenjuju na postupak izvršenja sankcija.…”

“…Nacionalni plan, str. 18 Potrebno je napomenuti kako je ovo posebna Direktiva (kao i ZSM) koja sustavno regulira navedenu tematiku kada su maloljetnici osumnjičenici i optuženici u kaznenim postupcima i u tom se kontekstu hrvatski zakonodavac nije trebao ograničavati institutima obiteljskog prava. Trebalo je ostaviti sucu za mladež mogućnost imenovanja odgovarajuće odrasle osobe prema njegovoj procjeni i diskrecijskoj ocjeni (što ionako čini kada donosi odluku o (ne)prihvaćanju određene osobe) i/ili imenovanju (postavljanju) posebnog skrbnika.…”