2006
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.078154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of the CMAP Correction to the CHARMM22 Protein Force Field: Dynamics of Hen Lysozyme

Abstract: The recently developed CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 force field (C22) is evaluated from 25 ns molecular dynamics simulations on hen lysozyme. Substantial deviations from experimental backbone root mean-square fluctuations and N-H NMR order parameters obtained in the C22 trajectories (especially in the loops) are eliminated by the CMAP correction. Thus, the C22/CMAP force field yields improved dynamical and structural properties of proteins in molecular dynamics simulations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
355
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(361 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
355
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, the GROMOS96 force field reproduces the order parameters of the rigid sites in ubiquitin quite well, 28 and the CHARMM C22/CMAP force field performs similarly well for the rigid sites of hen lysozyme. 23 By contrast, mobile regions of ubiquitin, such as the -hairpin loop and several of the loops closer to the Cterminus of the protein, turn out to be too floppy in the AMBER99 simulation, whereas they tend to be in good agreement with experimental results in the AMBER99SB simulation (Figure 2). Plots of the AMBER99 order parameters computed after 1 and 20 ns correlated against the experimental data ( Figure 3A and C) suggest that the 1 ns order parameters are the best result for the AMBER99 trajectory.…”
Section: Comparison Of Calculated Order Parameters With Experimentmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…On average, the GROMOS96 force field reproduces the order parameters of the rigid sites in ubiquitin quite well, 28 and the CHARMM C22/CMAP force field performs similarly well for the rigid sites of hen lysozyme. 23 By contrast, mobile regions of ubiquitin, such as the -hairpin loop and several of the loops closer to the Cterminus of the protein, turn out to be too floppy in the AMBER99 simulation, whereas they tend to be in good agreement with experimental results in the AMBER99SB simulation (Figure 2). Plots of the AMBER99 order parameters computed after 1 and 20 ns correlated against the experimental data ( Figure 3A and C) suggest that the 1 ns order parameters are the best result for the AMBER99 trajectory.…”
Section: Comparison Of Calculated Order Parameters With Experimentmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…8,14,25 For example, Buck et al used a variant of method 1 in which they calculated S 2 as the value of the internal correlation function at 6 ns, a time comparable to the rotational correlation time of the protein lysozyme. 8 Markwick et al carried out several short MD simulations, each of a length comparable to the time scale of rotational motion, for the B3 domain of protein G. 25 In that work, S 2 values were calculated by applying method 2 to each individual simulation and then averaging the resulting values over all simulations. These modifications of methods 1 and 2 yielded S 2 values in good agreement with experimental values, although it is unclear whether these modifications could be used more generally to remove the effects of long-time scale dynamics on S 2 values calculated from MD simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backbone amide order parameters have been measured for more than 200 proteins and used to quantify changes in conformational flexibility associated with protein folding, molecular recognition, and catalysis. 4 Values of S 2 obtained from protein molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been compared to those obtained from experiments to validate 6,7 and improve 8,9 MD simulations, and to aid in the interpretation of experiments. 10,11 Ubiquitin is a 76-residue protein that has been used as a model system for experimental and computational studies of protein structure and dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison with NMR parameters for lysozyme and ubiquitin-Hen egg white lysozyme has become a standard for evaluating the quality of force fields by comparing internal dynamics parameters calculated from MD simulations to NMR relaxation experiments [59][60][61][62][63] . The degree of backbone flexibility is specified by experimentally derived order parameters S 2 , which correspond to amide bond N-H librational motion.…”
Section: Force Field Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%