2006
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters

Abstract: The ff94 force field that is commonly associated with the AMBER simulation package is one of the most widely used parameter sets for biomolecular simulation. After a decade of extensive use and testing, limitations in this force field, such as over stabilization of α-helices, were reported by us and other researchers. This led to a number of attempts to improve these parameters, resulting in a variety of "AMBER" force fields and significant difficulty in determining which should be used for a particular applic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

59
6,167
0
19

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,369 publications
(6,392 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
59
6,167
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study was performed using the coordinates from the three X-ray structures of the CaM/IQ complex referred to as models A, B, and C (PDB code 2BE6) and models generated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at 300 K applying the amber99sb force field. 72 The simulations were carried out in GROMACS, 73 using the standard parameters delivered by the authors of the software. In total, two MD simulations of 120 ns were performed, starting from either model A or C, and the coordinates were recorded every 5 ps for a total of 48 000 MD models (24 000 from each simulation).…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study was performed using the coordinates from the three X-ray structures of the CaM/IQ complex referred to as models A, B, and C (PDB code 2BE6) and models generated by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at 300 K applying the amber99sb force field. 72 The simulations were carried out in GROMACS, 73 using the standard parameters delivered by the authors of the software. In total, two MD simulations of 120 ns were performed, starting from either model A or C, and the coordinates were recorded every 5 ps for a total of 48 000 MD models (24 000 from each simulation).…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Amber11 software package 44 utilizing the Amber ff99SB potential functions 45 for proteins was used to perform the REMD simulations. The Onufriev− Bashford−Case implicit solvent model was chosen to represent the solution environment around the protein in order to avoid possible confined aqueous volume effects and specific heat errors on the simulated structures.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,38 The REMD simulations were performed with the AMBER 11 software package along with Amber ff99SB potential functions for the protein. 50,51 A total number of 56 replicas were utilized with temperatures exponentially distributed between 283 and 490 K. 52 The initial structures were equilibrated for 500 ns for each replica with a time step of 2 fs. Each replica was then simulated for a total of 40 ns with exchanges attempted every 5 ps while trajectories were saved every 500 steps.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%