1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01563662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of surgical technique in prevention of retained and recurrent bile duct stones

Abstract: Approximately 10% of the 500,000 patients who undergo cholecystectomy for gallstones each year in the U.S.A. have associated choledocholithiasis. Of the patients who have a choledocholithotomy, 10-13% are found to have retained bile duct stones in the immediate postoperative period, and an unknown additional number are found to have biliary calculi subsequently. Residual bile duct calculi come from 3 sources, namely, "retained" stones that were overlooked during the initial operation, "retained" stones that we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, 33-8% of patients underwent more than one attempt at percutaneous extraction, giving an average of 1-5 attempts per patient. Failed clearance was caused by stone fragmentation (8), multiple or small stones (7), impacted stone (6), stone below a biliary stricture (3), large stone (1), intrahepatic stone (1), loss of the tract (5), tortuous tract (4), a narrow tract (3), anterior tract (2), tract perforation (2), and angulated bile duct (1) and was not determined in three patients.…”
Section: Percutaneous Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, 33-8% of patients underwent more than one attempt at percutaneous extraction, giving an average of 1-5 attempts per patient. Failed clearance was caused by stone fragmentation (8), multiple or small stones (7), impacted stone (6), stone below a biliary stricture (3), large stone (1), intrahepatic stone (1), loss of the tract (5), tortuous tract (4), a narrow tract (3), anterior tract (2), tract perforation (2), and angulated bile duct (1) and was not determined in three patients.…”
Section: Percutaneous Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, endoscopic duct clearance was attempted on more than one occasion in 22% of patients, averaging 1-3 attempts per patient. Failed duct clearance was the result of failure of endoscopic sphincterotomy in two patients (duodenal diverticulum (1) and papillary oedema (1)), impaction of a stone within the ampulla, intrahepatic biliary tree, common hepatic duct or cystic duct (6), stone above a bile duct stricture (3), and the T tube interfering with stone extraction (2). A stone was not found in the biliary tree in one patient and the reason for failed duct clearance was not determined in two.…”
Section: Endoscopic Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite duct exploration for common bile duct stones, retained stones are later demonstrated in 2-10% of patients [1][2][3]. In these patients, reoperation is associated with significant mortality and morbidity [4], and therefore several nonoperative procedures to remove these stones have been proposed as alternative methods to surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERCP included, have been used in pre operative exploration of the patient, a reli able technique is needed for further reduction of that rate [6,14,15,17,20,[22][23][24], Several methods are in use for intraopera tive investigation of the bile ducts. Besides cholangiography, one of these is manometry to study pressure and flow conditions in the bile system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%