2021
DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of public‐private partnerships for nutrition support research: An ASPEN Position Paper

Abstract: Parenteral and enteral nutrition support are key components of care for various medical and physiological conditions in infants, children, and adults. Nutrition support practices have advanced over time, driven by the goals of safe and sufficient delivery of needed nutrients and improved patient outcomes. These advances have been, and continue to be, dependent on research and development studies. Such studies address aspects of enteral and parenteral nutrition support: formulations, delivery devices, health ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eighteen articles comprising guidelines, consensus, recommendation, and position papers were excluded from the ranking process. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] An average of 29 articles (range: 19-52) of the 193 from the primary literature were denoted as most important by individual members of the author group. Eight papers from the primary literature (receiving 5 or more votes) were collectively identified as most important by the author group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eighteen articles comprising guidelines, consensus, recommendation, and position papers were excluded from the ranking process. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] An average of 29 articles (range: 19-52) of the 193 from the primary literature were denoted as most important by individual members of the author group. Eight papers from the primary literature (receiving 5 or more votes) were collectively identified as most important by the author group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bendavid et al 1 The centenary of the Harris-Benedict equations: How to assess energy requirements best? Recommendations from the ESPEN expert group Cober et al 2 ASPEN lipid injectable emulsion safety recommendations part 2: neonate and pediatric considerations Cuerda et al 3 ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in chronic intestinal failure Evans et al 4 The use of visceral proteins as nutrition markers: an ASPEN position paper Fiaccadori et al 5 ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in hospitalized patients with acute or chronic kidney disease Freeman et al 6 Medical management of chronic pancreatitis in children: a position paper by the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Pancreas Committee Hartwell et al 7 Nutrition therapy in the critically injured adult patient: a Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm Mechanick et al 8 Clinical nutrition research and the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of the ASPEN COVID-19 task force on nutrition research Moltu et al 9 Nutritional management of the critically ill neonate: a position paper of the ESPGHAN committee on nutrition Mueller et al 10 Importance of public-private partnerships for nutrition support research: an ASPEN position paper Muscaritoli et al 11 ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in cancer Robinson et al 12 Recommendations for photoprotection of parenteral nutrition for premature infants: an ASPEN position paper. Schwartz et al 13 Ethical aspects of artificially administered nutrition and hydration: an ASPEN position paper Snook et al 14 British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anemia in adults Thibault et al 15 ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition Weimann et al 16 ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery Wendel et al 17 Management of central venous access in children With intestinal failure: a position paper from the NASPGHAN Intestinal Rehabilitation Special Interest Group Worthington et al 18 Update on the use of filters for parenteral nutrition: an ASPEN position paper average uranium concentration at 57 times higher than the non-PN patients.…”
Section: First Author Titlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventions to correct nutrition and hydration deficits must be evidence-based and in accordance with the patients’ goals 78 . The care plan should be adjusted each time the patient’s condition changes 79 …”
Section: Recommendations For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%